Posted on 02/21/2018 12:06:33 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner (i.e., personal attacks).
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633313/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize Q Anon information into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
Excuse me, spyone, if you’re implying you’ve been following Q since the end of summer, you’re confused. This Q has only been posting since October 27, 2017. The others who were using the FBI Q Anon or the like on AMAs that others have claimed were Q on 4chan were not the same. Analisys shows writing, posting, and word usage styles are completely different. Q on AMAs was frequently used to designate the one being questioned.
Hmmmm........I look forward to that website stabilizing! :/
You’re only problem with your little gotcha moment is that BlueMondaySkipper is nobody with any sayso on the matter. Skipper is not the OP, not the keeper of the Ping list, basically, Skipper is just a poster on this thread. . . It’s like you saying it in response to one of the other trolls asking for your opinion whether it is or not.
Oh, by the way. It isn’t. Nice try. Your attempt to make it one puts you firmly in the troll category. It’s a standard troll ploy.
Well, you can certainly call it water if you like, but all I see is a huge case grasping at straws and extreme confirmation bias.
I'm not even sure how to verify a couple of those cases; twitter doesn't show me times for tweets, only dates. Also, what time zone is being stamped on the Q drops: GMT, Eastern, etc.?
Even if I could verify the times, the "proofs" are just too far of a reach.
Each person has their own level for being convinced, I suppose.
You talkin’ ‘bout Jeff “Secret” Sessions?
GREAT Synopsis!
Hi Swordmaker-
I see one crossing arm in your second photo. Part of it is showing to the right of the closest fireman. Are we to presume that arm had already been replaced prior to this photo having been taken ?
The question was “who went to Gitmo” - global elite is not an answer, I can say, “No it wasn’t” and where are we?
I’ve been reading this thread and the comments about “contrarians” - I’m not a contrarian I’ve just run out of the ability to believe all of the “wait until next week” and “global elite” stuff without sources that have definitive data in them - not more - ‘leading’ innuendo.
I don’t think that after all of these months that proven facts is not asking too much. Things like “it appears Tony is” at Gitmo is not a fact - he either is or he isn’t and, given the corruption that has been laid bare in the last 2 years I’m taking the position that I’ll believe it when I see it.
How many times have you read on FR that the Clintons have been “caught” and this is the end of them. Hasn’t happened since their corruption became national in 1992 ..... I’m not even from Missouri but I’ve adopted their motto - Show Me.
As for Q - I have no idea - he is or he isn’t a hoax and I’m not the only one that doesn’t KNOW.
It’s very likely. In my area, they can replace an arm in less than an hour. . . It takes only a few bolts. . . and they can’t open a controlled crossing without the arm in place. Heck, they can replace the entire crossing arm mechanism, arm, lights, bell, and all in a few hours. They’re interchangeable and they get hit regularly. They’re designed to be bolted on a foundation.
Apparently I composed this response to your #532 -- while you were composing your #537...
It appears that our only point of departure is whether the trailing engine was running with the train at the time of the collision -- or whether it was brought in later as a "rescue" unit...
Well, I went thru the work of typing this in the wee hours of the morning -- so, here 'tis: '-)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
First of all, the train was traveling left-to-right in all of the photos posted here.
Second, The train DID have TWO (2) engines:
1) [Top photo] The "Lead" "traction" engine (#145) IN FRONT (that hit the truck): Red, White, Blue centered chevrons on nose {"Flag Phase III"} livery. It was significantly damaged on the left half of the front. And, it ended up a full train-length past the point of collision at the crossing.
2) [bottom photo] The "trailing" or "pusher" engine at the REAR of the consist: "Teal over White" {"Chevron 7"} livery. AFAIK it was undamaged. It came to a stop near or in the crossing.
As I stated in #479, the rear engine later reversed direction and pulled the consist (probably minus the damaged #145 engine) -- back to Charlottesville.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
G'night, Friend! I'm headed for the bed at 5:20Am, my time...
Speaking of finding what you seek, NPR this morning, "Threats Against Schools Increase Since Florida Shooting"
"Year of the shark" effect in play. The rate of reporting does not reflect the rate of occurance.
Never trusted the sob Kerry as far as I could throw his stinking liberal ass.
>>US Cyber Task Force.
>>Important
My opinion:
Everyone in the military knows exactly how important comms are.
We have moved from the agricultural age to the industrial age to the technology age. So while agriculture and industry are still important, a great deal of our wealth is in information and technology. If you control information and technology, you control a nation and you control its people.
The media have long been controlled by the left/evil. Twitter, youtube, google, etc., are also controlled by the left. Cyber TF is important to keep these lines of commo open. Without comms no Q. Without Twitter, no comms from POTUS to the people.
Cyber also controls things like voting machines and TRANSMISSION of voting results. (You didn’t think they were being sent by carrier pigeon and pony express, did you?) So even if votes are counted correctly/fairly, if they are not transmitted correctly, we have corruption and compromised elections.
Cyber also controls the vast amount of data being gathered on ALL OF US by the government, deep state, google, etc. (Not sure how separate any of those entities are any more. They kind of merge together.)
What having control of the cybertransmission does is give the government (including especially the rogue elements) the ability to snoop on everything.
Election fraud is perpetrated mostly at the precinct level. Just as pickpockets and protection rackets work on a mark-by-mark basis.
This is about the Cyber Task Force. Can you make sense of this statement? What does frustrate me? Wouldn't it frustrate the FBI when people claim they're contributing to the false flags?
If so wouldn't that suggest this purge might be something to do with this Cyber task force?
Those are definitely not the same train.
One possibility .... Do you have the original link/source where those photos were posted? I am not discounting the possibility that the media/libs are trying to pull something here, but often the media use “stock photos” when they don’t have an actual photo of an event. Could this be what happened? Maybe they are just using a photo of some other train wreck so that they have a sensational photo to go with the article without having to go to the trouble of actually sending someone out to take a picture?
And no, I’m not defending the media or anyone involved in what I do believe is a conspiracy to murder Republican congressmen. Just suggesting a possibility for this one data point.
I'll get back to you.
Another thing that can be done for specific purpose is to weight the data to reflect portions of a group, to model accuracy, etc. So for example, take a number 1, define it as a number with two decimal places 1.00 and then multiple it by 0.8 to get a new value of 0.80.
1 = 1.00 --> 1.00 x 0.8 = 0.80; this is called 'weighting' the data.
It is important to note that at the screen, a viewer will see '1'. Inside a computer or programmable memory device, the number '1' is redefined with a two-decimal attribute as 1.00 and then multipled with weighting factor 0.8 to create a new value 0.80. The viewer SEES '1' but the system has created and stored '0.80' because '1' is the output of the function round(0.80).
Weighting has legitimate uses in statistics but there are no legitimate purposes for weighting actual VOTE COUNTs. But weighting vote counts can be a fraudulent means of stealing an election. Weighting can be used to downweight a candidate designated to lose or upweight a candidate designated to win, or a combination of both.
Here are two simple examples of two candidates, one of which is downweighted to lose in County X and the other that is upweighted to win in County Z. There are 5 voters in County X labeled 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 voters in County Z labeled 6,7,8,9,10,11. Note the number of votes cast for both counties together are the same whether weighted or left unaltered.
COUNTY X Candidate A (Unaltered)
| Voter | Vote | Displayed | Weight Factor | Stored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.00 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
| Totals | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 2.00 |
**********************************
COUNTY X Candidate B (Downweighted)
| Voter | Vote | Displayed | Weight Factor | Stored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.80 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 0.00 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.80 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.80 |
| Totals | 3 | 3 | 0.8 | 2.40 |
***********************************************************
COUNTY Z Candidate A (Upweighted)
| Voter | Vote | Displayed | Weight Factor | Stored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.20 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.20 |
| Totals | 3 | 3 | 1.2 | 3.60 |
**********************************
COUNTY Z Candidate B (Unaltered)
| Voter | Vote | Displayed | Weight Factor | Stored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.00 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.00 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1.00 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.00 |
| Totals | 3 | 3 | 1.0 | 3.00 |
COUNTIES X AND Z TOTALS FOR CANDIDATES A AND B
| County | Candidate | Raw Votes | Displayed Total | Transmitted Total | Rounded for Summing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | A | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2 |
| . | B | 3 | 3 | 2.40 | 2 |
| Z | A | 3 | 3 | 3.60 | 4 |
| . | B | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3 |
| X + Y | A | 5 | . | 5.60 | 6 |
| . | B | 6 | . | 5.40 | 5 |
Candidate A wins 6 votes to 5 over Candidate B even though raw votes had Candidate B with 6 votes to 5 over Candidate A. Among millions of votes, this scheme would be a nightmare to unravel and with more fraud sophistication, this scheme would very likely never be uncovered. Most cries of voter fraud are met with responses that it's all 'sour grapes'.
Note that Candidate B actually won the unaltered vote count in County X and tied in County Z but lost the overall stored and transmitted-rounded weighted counts. Note also that each country election office will see displayed their actual raw vote counts but they won't see it for other counties in their states. The subtotal sums are altered even though the overall votes cast are the same for altered and unaltered. This is a slick scam scheme for stealing an election and without much doubt, Soros and others have the IT people to create sophisticated algorithms to pull it off. (There is chatter that Soro's satellite uplinks from his operation in Cayman Island were jammed during election night 2016 so that altered results could not be substituted for national totals, hence so-called Russian interference was interfering with Hillary stealing the election).
Now here is the kicker. Counties X and Z don't see what the other did. The weakness is that although counties can check and verify their own totals, they are unable to verify the totals of other counties. This is compartmentalization of county vote totals and it allows the alteration of data to be lost in the sums. One way to counter this weakness is to mandate a statewide display of all real-time counts by county, district, and precinct together with statewide totals so that anyone can check to see that the reported totals are real and unaltered. Weakness still remains at district and precinct levels and those would have to be displayed as well. Needless to say, a lot of eyes would be needed to be checking real-time totals.
However, more is needed. Any particular district or precinct can be compromised and thus skew results of a county. This is where Block Chain Technology can bridge the gap and strengthen the system to an extent that with real-time cross-checking, the voting system becomes highly impregnable to electronic fraud.
Now it would be wonderful if we could mandate by law that every voter dip their index finger into a well of purple ink after they voted so they can't easily vote again. But with our Constitution, I think this would not be a viable path to follow to assure 'one voter - one vote'. Such a system also does not solve weaknesses in vote transmission whether done electronically or by Pony Express.
Slightly revised from 7/31/2017 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3573409/posts?page=13#13
You said more.
Very dishonest of you after your offer to, and I quote, “say no more”. Please do the honorable thing and keep your promises, or you will be, as many suspect, here for nefarious reasons.
Think of all the time and bandwidth you will save yourself and FR when you stop clogging up this discussion.
>> The CIA has been running things for a while now. I thought their mission was FOREIGN intelligence. Am I mistaken?
yes it was. In fact, it’s primary mission (based on what I recall and some things I’ve read lately) was to fight against USSR/communism during the cold war. Then after USSR disintegrated (Thank you, Pres. Reagan!), their mission had been mostly fulfilled.
My guess: No organization ever shrinks or disbands when its purpose has been accomplished. They do one of 2 things: find a new mission or deny that the mission has been accomplished.
Examples: The March of Dimes was created to fight polio. Polio is long gone, but the MoD is not. It would be a shame if all those execs lost their fat paychecks, no? The NAACP was founded to get equal rights for “colored people”. If they admitted that they’d achieved their goal, no more fat paychecks for their leaders. So they have to continue to find racism everywhere, or actually stir it up to justify their existence.
Anyway, the CIA has probably grown out of control for similar reasons. Then add to that the fact that they have nearly unfettered power and virtually no oversight, no controls on them, and you have a recipe for the organizational form of cancer.
I’m not saying that we should not have the CIA or some similar organization. But the CIA as it currently exists seems to have morphed from an agency that fight communism and protects US citizens to an agency that promotes communism and targets/harasses/spies on US citizens. Just like a cancer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.