To: generally
read post 531:
"the use of technology to avoid or frustrate law enforcement"
This is about the Cyber Task Force. Can you make sense of this statement? What does frustrate me? Wouldn't it frustrate the FBI when people claim they're contributing to the false flags?
If so wouldn't that suggest this purge might be something to do with this Cyber task force?
555 posted on
02/22/2018 4:11:10 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
I imagine there are tons of things one could do to avoid/frustrate LE.
Some guesses: jamming communications channels, masquerading as LE, sending LE scrambling to the wrong place while you are committing a crime in a different location, ....
562 posted on
02/22/2018 4:49:47 AM PST by
generally
( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
To: Steve Van Doorn
read post 531: "the use of technology to avoid or frustrate law enforcement"
This is about the Cyber Task Force. Can you make sense of this statement? What does frustrate me? Wouldn't it frustrate the FBI when people claim they're contributing to the false flags?
If so wouldn't that suggest this purge might be something to do with this Cyber task force? I can. This is about unbreakable encryption on iPhones. . . End-to-end 256 bit AES encryption for which only the user has the key and the FBI demand that Apple (and other tech companies) build in a back door (impossible, if security is the goal).
749 posted on
02/22/2018 1:16:03 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you racist, bigot!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson