Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flaris Personal Jets Take Off
Robb Report ^ | Mary Grady

Posted on 07/01/2014 7:31:16 AM PDT by PeteePie

Flaris, a new aviation company based in Poland, made an unexpected appearance at the Paris Air Show in June with its prototype of a single-engine personal jet, the LAR01. The all-composite design allows for sweeping lines, with a sharp nose, a cabin that seats four, and long, narrow wings for aerodynamic efficiency. - See more at: http://robbreport.com/aviation/flaris-personal-jets-take?utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=relatedlinks&utm_campaign=aviation#sthash.PFsSTX3s.dpuf

(Excerpt) Read more at robbreport.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Hobbies; Travel
KEYWORDS: aerospace; airplane; aviation; jets; travel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: PeteePie
Or, you could buy a new Cirrus Vision SF50:

21 posted on 07/01/2014 8:13:33 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie

Can the jet carry any ordinance? I didn’t see any hard points.

If so, I want one.
5.56mm


22 posted on 07/01/2014 8:20:28 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

I wuz thinking put a tailhook on it and land it on my yacht. Taking off might be a little difficult - I’d need a hundred knots of wind over the deck. That...is mere engineering.


23 posted on 07/01/2014 8:22:42 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn
As a general rule, I like to see the flutter test results before the design of an aircraft of this type is frozen.
As a hard and fast rule, I expect to see them before I would fly in the plane.

Have you seen that "GE - Little Girl" commercial? At the end frame you see what appears to be an airliner flapping along!? Hmmm, flutter test on that one would be ... interesting!

24 posted on 07/01/2014 8:24:53 AM PDT by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

Salamander, ach du lieber! That was the first thing I thought of too!


25 posted on 07/01/2014 8:27:17 AM PDT by PeteePie (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie

Looks like it doesn’t have anti-ice or de-ice equipment.


26 posted on 07/01/2014 8:36:51 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

JATO might solve the problem.

5.56mm


27 posted on 07/01/2014 8:38:48 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie
I prefer the stylings of the Epic Victory

28 posted on 07/01/2014 9:11:26 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 04-Bravo; 1FASTGLOCK45; 1stFreedom; 2ndDivisionVet; 2sheds; 60Gunner; 6AL-4V; A.A. Cunningham; ...
Aviation and Aerospace ping

Click here to view: Highlights in the History of Aviation and Aerospace - The Past, The Present, and The Future

Please ping me to aviation and aerospace articles. Thank you.

If you want added to or removed from this ping list, please contact EveningStar or Paleo Conservative.

29 posted on 07/01/2014 9:43:45 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Only $1.5 million. I’ll keep one at each of my vacation houses.

A new Cessna 172 can go for over $500,000. I like the design of this jet. It looks like it has great visibility and would be quiet in the cabin.


30 posted on 07/01/2014 9:55:13 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

nice


31 posted on 07/01/2014 9:56:21 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SES1066
Depending on materials, might have a nice, low RCS from the ground with the intake shielded by the fuselage.

Good for sneaking into other countries if the SHTF.

32 posted on 07/01/2014 10:14:16 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
I really dig the suicide doors. Hope they don't come open in flight.

Not likely. Looks like the door has bolts around its periphery. I count 11.

33 posted on 07/01/2014 10:18:24 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wrench
. Not enough fuel or cruise time to take advantage of the speed.

I don't understand what you mean.

1,500 miles at speeds of up to 435 mph. That's over 3 hours of flight.

34 posted on 07/01/2014 10:27:56 AM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie
While I commend their ability to make a prototype, we all know that serial production is much much harder ergo the Eclipse Jet. Their has been many single Jets as many have noted with the pictures posted.

However, tangent to this i.e. a fast single...

* Keep your eyes open to a potential role out of the Synergy Prototype ( info via Facebook ) they are getting close.
* The Patent for Synergy is final, research the how's and why's of the aerodynamic breakthroughs in the link below.
* IMHO this is the program to watch...

Patent Link: https://www.google.com/patents/US8657226

35 posted on 07/01/2014 10:35:45 AM PDT by taildragger (Not my Circus, Not my Monkey ( Boy does that apply to DC...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie

I like the placement of the engine.
Up there it can land on grass fields without picking up debris.
Too bad I haven’t an extra couple million laying about.


36 posted on 07/01/2014 10:42:07 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

You trumped the coolness factor of this article with this plane, awesome!


37 posted on 07/01/2014 10:59:50 AM PDT by PeteePie (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
Not likely. Looks like the door has bolts around its periphery. I count 11.

I dunno about how likely it would be. Seems to me that the bolts would be retracted by the door handle. What sort of interlocks are provided to prevent actuation of the door handle while in flight, yet not hinder egress after a mishap?

Airline doors have to open inwards before they can swing outwards, and because of this they cannot be moved against the cabin pressurization when at altitude even after the door handle has been actuated.

38 posted on 07/01/2014 11:07:05 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

I think I see an interesting R/C model design in my future


39 posted on 07/01/2014 11:17:58 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

They come open upon landing. Giant drag brakes. /s


40 posted on 07/01/2014 11:19:27 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson