Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PETA: Naked chicken corpses aren't sexy
The Weekly Times ^ | 02/07/2013

Posted on 02/07/2013 8:11:01 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

ANIMAL welfare extremists want to ban the display of naked chickens in supermarkets.

They also protest against pictures of raw chickens in ads, The Weekly Times reports.

The American founder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, president Ingrid Newkirk, criticised a newspaper for running a picture of a raw chicken.

"We don't want to see any chickens on display, but instead want them to live natural, happy lives with their families.

"Sexily displaying the corpse of a chicken who has been bred to grow so big, so quickly, that many collapse under their own weight, is just additionally offensive."

Other supporters expressed disgust at the sight of plucked chickens in supermarkets.

A PETA spokesman said the organisation wants everyone to go vegan.



TOPICS: Agriculture; Food; Humor
KEYWORDS: peta; sexychicken
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: KosmicKitty
the chick(en)s, out for a walk?

61 posted on 02/07/2013 11:16:38 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,spend it all today;who can take your income,tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Just ask this guy about his family life.
62 posted on 02/07/2013 11:27:20 AM PST by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AF_Blue
asphyxiate the avian

You almost owed me a new keyboard. LMAO

63 posted on 02/07/2013 11:37:03 AM PST by Fast Moving Angel (A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Fast Moving Angel; AF_Blue

I *wondered* when a choke the chiken joke was gonna show up.

Thanks.


64 posted on 02/07/2013 11:59:42 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; AF_Blue

Agreed. And I’m going to have to remember this — a more polite way of stating the same thing. (Thanks, AF!)


65 posted on 02/07/2013 12:23:07 PM PST by Fast Moving Angel (A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: John Freeman

Hell, they ain’t so hot with their clothes ON!


66 posted on 02/07/2013 5:01:55 PM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers ("I'm not anti-anything, I just wanna be free." - Mike Muir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

We can also thank the Victorians for the word “dressing” as it relates to bread and other food items packed into the cavity of a bird.

Because there is no rude connotation to the phrase “get dressed”. :)


67 posted on 02/07/2013 5:06:52 PM PST by ZirconEncrustedTweezers ("I'm not anti-anything, I just wanna be free." - Mike Muir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ZirconEncrustedTweezers

The piano legs in Victorian parlors were draped in velvet skirts so there wouldn’t be naked legs in the house.

Books in the bookcase had to be segregated; male authors on one shelf, female authors on the other.

The bovine “bull” was strictly verboten; it was referred to as a `male cow’, `gentleman cow’, or `cow critter”.

I go back far enough to have heard an old geezer complain, “Where were girls in miniskirts when _I_ needed them!?”


68 posted on 02/07/2013 5:28:22 PM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AF_Blue
To asphyxiate the avian that had previously transgressed the carriageway?

I like that answer.Actually it involves a certain member being stuck in the chicken.

69 posted on 02/08/2013 7:03:02 AM PST by painter (Obamahood,"Steal from the working people and give to the worthless.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson