 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Posted on 08/12/2010 12:18:09 PM PDT by decimon
BOULDER—A new analysis of the unusually long solar cycle that ended in 2008 suggests that one reason for the long cycle could be a stretching of the Sun’s conveyor belt, a current of plasma that circulates between the Sun’s equator and its poles. The results should help scientists better understand the factors controlling the timing of solar cycles and could lead to better predictions.
The study was conducted by Mausumi Dikpati, Peter Gilman, and Giuliana de Toma, all scientists in the High Altitude Observatory at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), and by Roger Ulrich at the University of California, Los Angeles. It appeared on July 30 in Geophysical Research Letters. The study was funded by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor, and by NASA.
The Sun goes through cycles lasting approximately 11 years that include phases with increased magnetic activity, more sunspots, and more solar flares, than phases with less activity. The level of activity on the Sun can affect navigation and communications systems on Earth. Puzzlingly, solar cycle 23, the one that ended in 2008, lasted longer than previous cycles, with a prolonged phase of low activity that scientists had difficulty explaining.
The new NCAR analysis suggests that one reason for the long cycle could be changes in the Sun’s conveyor belt. Just as Earth’s global ocean circulation transports water and heat around the planet, the Sun has a conveyor belt in which plasma flows along the surface toward the poles, sinks, and returns toward the equator, transporting magnetic flux along the way.
“The key for explaining the long duration of cycle 23 with our dynamo model is the observation of an unusually long conveyor belt during this cycle,” Dikpati says. “Conveyor belt theory indicates that shorter belts, such as observed in cycle 22, should be more common in the Sun.”
Recent measurements gathered and analyzed by Ulrich and colleagues show that in solar cycle 23, the poleward flow extended all the way to the poles, while in previous solar cycles the flow turned back toward the equator at about 60 degrees latitude. Furthermore, as a result of mass conservation, the return flow was slower in cycle 23 than in previous cycles.
In their paper, Dikpati, Gilman, and de Toma used simulations to model how the solar plasma conveyor belt affected the solar cycle. The authors found that the longer conveyor belt and slower return flow could have caused the longer duration of cycle 23.
The NCAR team’s computer model, known as the Predictive Flux-transport Dynamo Model, simulates the evolution of magnetic fields in the outer third of the Sun’s interior (the solar convection zone). It provides a physical basis for projecting the nature of upcoming solar cycles from the properties of previous cycles, as opposed to statistical models that emphasize correlations between cycles. In 2004, the model successfully predicted that cycle 23 would last longer than usual.
According to Dikpati, the duration of a solar cycle is probably determined by the strength of the Sun’s meridional flow. The combination of this flow and the lifting and twisting of magnetic fields near the bottom of the convection zone generates the observed symmetry of the Sun’s global field with respect to the solar equator.
“This study highlights the importance of monitoring and improving measurement of the Sun’s meridional circulation,” Ulrich says. “In order to improve predictions of the solar cycle, we need a strong effort to understand large-scale patterns of solar plasma motion.”
About the article
Title: Impact of changes in the Sun's conveyor-belt on recent solar cycles
Authors: Mausumi Dikpati, Peter Gilman, Giuliana de Toma, and Roger Ulrich
Publication: Geophysical Research Letters
“...the poleward flow extended all the way to the poles, while in previous solar cycles the flow turned back toward the equator at about 60 degrees latitude.”
But, of course, that couldn’t have contributed to any ice melt they’re so excited about......./sarc
Sunbelt ping.
Rove, you magnificent b*stard!
Either way the sun’s ice caps are going to melt pretty quickly.
Isn’t oxygen needed for fire? Is there O2 on the sun?
The sun is not on fire but at an intense temperature due to thermonuclear processes. Something like that.
Seriously?
|
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
There is no 'fire' on the sun. Just lots and LOTS of intense heat from a bunch of stuff I can't entirely explain. I believe it's mainly doing a nuclear fusion process of Hydrogen into Helium.
related:
Hotter-burning sun warming the planet
The Wastington Times | 7/18/10 | Staff
Posted on 08/09/2010 5:24:08 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2567624/posts
Cheers!
Solar cycles are about 11 years and Jupiter takes about that long to go around the sun. The times might not match up exactly but they’re in the same ballpark. Maybe depending on what some of the other planets are doing combined with Jupiter’s orbit accounts for this stuff. Or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.