Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uranium Seawater Extraction Makes Nuclear Power Completely Renewable
Forbes ^ | July 1, 2016 | James Conca

Posted on 07/01/2016 4:39:49 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

America, Japan and China are racing to be the first nation to make nuclear energy completely renewable. The hurdle is making it economic to extract uranium from seawater, because the amount of uranium in seawater is truly inexhaustible.

And it seems America is in the lead. New technological breakthroughs from DOE’s Pacific Northwest (PNNL) and Oak Ridge (ORNL) national laboratories have made removing uranium from seawater within economic reach and the only question is – when will the source of uranium for our nuclear power plants change from mined ore to seawater extraction?

Nuclear fuel made with uranium extracted from seawater makes nuclear power completely renewable. It’s not just that the 4 billion tons of uranium in seawater now would fuel a thousand 1,000-MW nuclear power plants for a 100,000 years. It’s that uranium extracted from seawater is replenished continuously, so nuclear becomes as endless as solar, hydro and wind....

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Science
KEYWORDS: brazil; brics; china; energy; fission; india; japan; nuclear; russia; southafrica; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: huckfillary; Moonman62

Yes, counter-productive government red tape is the only remaining real problem.

As for the costs, a solution is at hand: replace expensive, bespoke reactors with mass-produced modular reactors. Use the economies-of-scale inherent to mass production to make the cost/unit of power drop. Build modular plants, so that only relatively small up-front capital investments are required. That would greatly reduce financial risk, and further reduce overall costs.


21 posted on 07/01/2016 5:27:07 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So, that’s how William Windom’s character on the Night Gallery episode “Little Girl Lost” blew up the entire Planet.


22 posted on 07/01/2016 5:27:16 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Hillary Clinton has killed four more People than Three Mile Island.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zek157

Agreed.


23 posted on 07/01/2016 5:34:34 PM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Thanks


24 posted on 07/01/2016 5:38:33 PM PDT by samtheman (Trump For America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I remember reading about modular reactors years ago and I think Bill Gates invested in them. What happened?


25 posted on 07/01/2016 5:59:12 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

BUT BUT BUT... IT’S NUCLEAR


26 posted on 07/01/2016 7:00:17 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Uranium?

27 posted on 07/01/2016 8:04:58 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afghanistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Hitlery gets in the ChiComs will have all our data within 24 hours. Right now just the muzzies have it.


28 posted on 07/01/2016 9:51:55 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

My (limited) understanding is that this has become an “any day now” type of thing.


29 posted on 07/01/2016 11:37:31 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Uranium? Pfffft! Now Upsidaisium, there’s the future! ;-)


30 posted on 07/01/2016 11:46:59 PM PDT by r_barton (GO TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bkmk


31 posted on 07/02/2016 12:26:35 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (It's a shame enobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

The biggest problem is that natural gas fired power plants are cheap and easy. Nuclear cannot begin to compete on base price regardless of reasonability of the regulatory stance.
..........
True. But 4th generations nuclear power plants will be cheaper.


32 posted on 07/02/2016 8:46:40 AM PDT by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bump


33 posted on 07/02/2016 11:44:11 AM PDT by Noob1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Since they are extracting metals from seawater, I wonder if this is really a scheme to get government to fund extracting gold from seawater?


34 posted on 07/02/2016 11:46:03 AM PDT by r_barton (GO TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
But 4th generations nuclear power plants will be cheaper.

No they aren't, sadly.

35 posted on 07/02/2016 3:12:20 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Disagree.

The beta’s won’t be cheaper but mass produced truck sized reactors will be.

The cost decline curve will be much steeper and faster than for solar.


36 posted on 07/02/2016 7:50:47 PM PDT by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...

Meanwhile, at least 7000 years worth of energy waits on the continental shelf in the form of methane clathrates and hydrates -- and without a radioactive waste disposal problem.

· String Theory Ping List ·
Periodic Table of Rejected Elements
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


37 posted on 07/03/2016 6:45:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

as well there’s an equal amount of waste uranium that can be used.


38 posted on 07/04/2016 7:05:04 AM PDT by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The key word in all this is the word “renewable”. The point is to have the government reclassify nuclear power as a renewable energy source.


39 posted on 07/04/2016 7:06:08 AM PDT by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Using a breeder reactor design like the French one, along with the pebble bed design from Germany (which got kiboshed by the idiot Greeniacs before any were built) would minimize the waste problem, but it would still exist, and as electrical needs balloon in a post-internal-combustion era, so would the waste problem. Most of the waste would be low-level, and more or less safe in under 20 years; long-term waste disposal is a political problem for the most part -- but aren't those always the hardest ones?

40 posted on 07/04/2016 8:38:37 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson