Posted on 07/03/2015 6:35:05 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Particularly since gay men have so many sex partners.
They had to start somewhere. Just say'n
Polygamy, group marriage, consensual incest .... love is all you need.
I know a nice lady in Bel Air that is going to leave $30 Million Dollars to her Dog, ostensibly for care and pampering. She just got the dog a few years ago, it is about 3-4 years old and she is in her 90’s. It is a French Bulldog, cutest little devil. I was thinking of Marrying her DOG before she passes. Is there any valid legal reason why I can’t?? She might even give me permission If I ask her first. But what about the LAW???
Why not one? Content & committed to single life, what alleged rights are the celebate denied?
There is no logic the gay lobby used to get same sex marriage legalized that cannot be applied to polygamy. It’s the exact same argument.
P4L
> Particularly since gay men have so many sex partners.
From what I’m seeing online and hearing through discussions with others familiar with the gay lifestyle, many gay couples seem to have open marriages which I just don’t get. Don’t two people marry for the purpose of having a reverent relationship where they are faithful to each other and monogamous? Why even get married if you are going to have multiple sex partners after you get married. Its as though they are intentionally making a mockery of the institution of marriage (which is exactly what I think is going on).
No particular reason. Once you redefine something, you can’t tell anyone else they have no right to do the same thing. Marriage will have no meaning, which is what they want.
Don’t forget she is also the candidate that will continue and increase the freebies.
Polygamy is sensible in a tribal culture where fertile females are limited and males are far fewer (usually due to warfare). Survival of the tribe is in doubt, so the best is made with what little there is.
Robust cultures find a 1:1 male/female pairing is optimal for raising the next generation. Living in the resulting luxury, new generations opt for novelty, forgetting the hard won lessons of the past.
I think one thing we need to do is to forever stop using the euphemistic term, “gay”. Call it what it is, either homosexual or Sodomite. It’ll be difficult because “gay” is so mainstream now, but I’m making an effort.
I suppose it won’t make any difference when it comes to the Big Picture, but it’ll make me feel better. “Gay” sounds just too precious; practicing Sodomy is far from precious.
save for sharing
best essay I have seen on the subject
Ayn Rand told a story of her days as a Hollywood scriptwriter. In the 1930s, I think. She knew another girl in the business, and one day the two of them saw an associate drive by in a brand new, fancy automobile. Rand's friend was livid with jealousy.
Ayn Rand believed in the American dream -- she said: "But if you work hard and save your money, you'll be able to buy a car just like that."
Her friend replied: "I don't want a car just like that. I want her to drive into a tree and smash her car!"
Homosexuals don't really want marriage to be available to them -- they want that sort of deep, meaningful relationship taken away from normal people.
Hell just marry her, adopt the dog. That works now, and in CA you could divorce her the next day and get 50% right?
I’m sure the dog could get plenty of pampering for $15 million. :)
The Arabs have a saying: “One key in your pocket is silent but two keys make a jangle.”
Why not? Not only would the dog not say no, if you asked it to marry you, right after you gave it a doggie treat, the dog would probably jump up and down, lick your face, and wag its tail furiously. Which would mean to a normal person that yes, the dog would be happy to marry you.
“There is no logic the gay lobby used to get same sex marriage legalized that cannot be applied to polygamy. It’s the exact same argument.”
Wrong. The logic is simple.
The left advocates for people they don’t care about in order to control people they hate, which in this case are Christians.
That is the logic. That is why they did it. I’m shocked gays put any stock in marriage at all, beyond the economic benefits available.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.