How about THREE?
Meet the Massachusetts THROUPLE
Particularly since gay men have so many sex partners.
They had to start somewhere. Just say'n
Polygamy, group marriage, consensual incest .... love is all you need.
I know a nice lady in Bel Air that is going to leave $30 Million Dollars to her Dog, ostensibly for care and pampering. She just got the dog a few years ago, it is about 3-4 years old and she is in her 90’s. It is a French Bulldog, cutest little devil. I was thinking of Marrying her DOG before she passes. Is there any valid legal reason why I can’t?? She might even give me permission If I ask her first. But what about the LAW???
Why not one? Content & committed to single life, what alleged rights are the celebate denied?
There is no logic the gay lobby used to get same sex marriage legalized that cannot be applied to polygamy. It’s the exact same argument.
P4L
No particular reason. Once you redefine something, you can’t tell anyone else they have no right to do the same thing. Marriage will have no meaning, which is what they want.
Don’t forget she is also the candidate that will continue and increase the freebies.
Polygamy is sensible in a tribal culture where fertile females are limited and males are far fewer (usually due to warfare). Survival of the tribe is in doubt, so the best is made with what little there is.
Robust cultures find a 1:1 male/female pairing is optimal for raising the next generation. Living in the resulting luxury, new generations opt for novelty, forgetting the hard won lessons of the past.
I think one thing we need to do is to forever stop using the euphemistic term, “gay”. Call it what it is, either homosexual or Sodomite. It’ll be difficult because “gay” is so mainstream now, but I’m making an effort.
I suppose it won’t make any difference when it comes to the Big Picture, but it’ll make me feel better. “Gay” sounds just too precious; practicing Sodomy is far from precious.
save for sharing
best essay I have seen on the subject
The Arabs have a saying: “One key in your pocket is silent but two keys make a jangle.”
Fascinating stuff.
It is not good to mock the Designer.
Whats this I stuff from the author.On a I ride.People have been saying this for the last year.
The answer is that they only wanted to destroy judeo-christian concepts but know that polygamy would not be tolerated, especially be liberal feminists. If they break that alliance it’ll hurt them both.
There is zero reason to continue to discriminate against polygamy, incest, and beastiality under the new understanding of morals. If conservative activists are smart which is debatable they will push (as the liberals have) for the rights of everybody and bring the whole rotten edifice crashing down instead of letting society get away with the hypocrisy of continuing to only grant rights to a favored few.