Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin's Laser Can Stop a Truck From Over a Mile Away
End Gadget ^ | March 5, 2015 | Daniel Cooper

Posted on 03/05/2015 6:42:31 AM PST by lbryce

Lasers have staggering range, can attack land or air-based targets and are dirt-cheap to fire, making them ideal for a military with one eye on the budget. Now, Lockheed Martin has worked out that the technology could also be used for stopping a car without resorting to lethal force. The company has been testing out a new fiber-optic laser, called ATHENA, which was able to burn through the engine manifold of a truck that was over a mile away.

For the purposes of the test, the truck had its engine and drive train running, although the vehicle itself was up on props. Rather than causing the engine to explode, as per Hollywood, the truck was simply rendered unable to move. Reading between the lines, perhaps Lockheed believes that the gear will be a useful, potentially non-lethal precaution against explosive vehicles being driven, at speed, towards infrastructure points, guard towers or military bases.

(Excerpt) Read more at engadget.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: laser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I've been reading for years about these incredible breakthroughs in military applications, yet they never seem to get on the battlefield.

Lasers that can blow up trucks up to a mile away? I've seen lots of purty ISIS trucks, hundreds or more traveling in caravans unmolested and undeterred. Yeah, that word "experimental" comes up a lot. So why we can't we do some "experimental" blowing up of these stolen trucks?

Another thing. Pakistani skies are just crowded to the stratosphere with drones, killing all sorts of people. Why can't we get some of the same drones blowing people like those who recently killed a Turkish young man, cooked him, asked his mother to try this tasty treat and then to her insane horror told her she just ate her son?

1 posted on 03/05/2015 6:42:31 AM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I was curious.
If a laser weapon is just coherent light, wouldn’t a reflector make a good defense against it? A mirror, even?


2 posted on 03/05/2015 6:44:42 AM PST by RandallFlagg (Hobo: "I think you're gonna need a lot of dump trucks.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

So only drive in the rain or on low cover cloudy days.


3 posted on 03/05/2015 6:45:45 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I missed that story and gladly so


4 posted on 03/05/2015 6:46:04 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Way back when, similar reports like this were issued of a test by a White Sands facility (called HELSTEF). IIRC, that stood for High Energy Laser Systems Test & Evaluation Facility - a laser lab. Many big lasers, mostly chemical in nature.

They filmed a test of a laser taking out a booster rocket(leading everyone to think this is possible on a mid-boost rocket)...impressive....just like this shown here.

What I want to see instead of the result is the facility or physical plant it took to do it.


5 posted on 03/05/2015 6:46:34 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Mirrors on your roof and hood would prove to be very entertaining.


6 posted on 03/05/2015 6:47:01 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The weapon is code named “Jewish Lighning”.


7 posted on 03/05/2015 6:48:11 AM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

So the guy in the car can jump out with his bomb belt and blow everyone up. Don’t sell those .50’s yet.


8 posted on 03/05/2015 6:48:36 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Turn the rear view mirror around and zap a bystander or two.


9 posted on 03/05/2015 6:49:20 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Mirrors, movement, dispersion lens, etc.

Yes, they all would work to a certain extent.

But with a powerful enough laser, the tiny defects of any of these defenses eventually fail.

The reason we don’t see these as battlefield weapons is that the power sources necessary are prohibitive.


10 posted on 03/05/2015 6:49:23 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
laser hitting Planet Hillary....




11 posted on 03/05/2015 6:49:58 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Bullard Reflects, by Malcolm Jameson


12 posted on 03/05/2015 6:50:16 AM PST by null and void ( If race doesn't matter, why does it matter so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Yes but there are limits. Mirrors do absorb some of the heat. Most mirrors/reflectors are not made of materials that allow that heat to be disbursed. Further, once the mirror starts to heat, the reflective qualities drop off. In short, you can laser burn a mirror or other reflective surface. It does take a little while longer though.


13 posted on 03/05/2015 6:51:27 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Keep this away from NASCAR fans!


14 posted on 03/05/2015 6:54:58 AM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
So why we can't we do some "experimental" blowing up of these stolen trucks?

I'm all for it, but we'd have to carry around the equivalent of the Hoover Dam electrical output, in our back pockets, to do that.

The power requirements are currently horrendous.

I remember some experiments at Balcones several years ago that actually dimmed the lights of Austin...and that was during the off-peak times of 2300-0500.

15 posted on 03/05/2015 6:56:10 AM PST by OldSmaj (obama is a worthless mohametan. Impeach his ass now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
I've been reading for years about these incredible breakthroughs in military applications, yet they never seem to get on the battlefield.

If my husband can pop balloons in the basement at 20 feet with a hand-held laser, the U. S. government can deploy lasers as weapons. Why this never really happens is beyond me.

16 posted on 03/05/2015 6:58:50 AM PST by Cry if I Wanna (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Non-lethal?


17 posted on 03/05/2015 6:59:38 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cry if I Wanna

Does it really never happen, or are they simply not letting the world know?

Classification has many levels, including beyond Top Secret.


18 posted on 03/05/2015 7:05:22 AM PST by Alas Babylon! (As we say in the Air Force, "You know you're over the target when you start getting flak!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I recall in one of these military laser stories a general asked a tech guy what would happen if they cover missiles with a reflective surface and then spin them. The tech guy replied with something like ‘Imagine the laser like a huge shotgun. Would spinning and mirrors stop a giant shotgun?’ I have no idea if that’s scientifically right or not.

FReegards


19 posted on 03/05/2015 7:05:28 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed

Sounds more like a description of a particle projectile cannon... very Mechwarrior.


20 posted on 03/05/2015 7:07:50 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson