Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Part Four: Three Bizarre Events
Butterdezillion's Blog ^ | April 5, 2013 | butterdezillion

Posted on 04/05/2013 9:15:38 AM PDT by butterdezillion

Three events that made no sense at the time now make sense. I'll C&P the substance in the first comment so the HTML will (hopefully) transfer.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 0pansification; abercrombie; afterbirfturds; arizona; bigfat; birftards; birthers; butterdezillion; certifigate; crime; dupnik; eligibility; giffords; hdoh; napolitano; naturalborncitizen; seizethecrap; wrappedupinlasagna; zullo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-126 last
To: Elderberry

No other sources than him and the primary sources he cited.

My point is that if our sworn enemies - communists and Islamists - have the power to hit us it is really, really dangerous that we have as CINC a guy who was installed by a coup and has always aligned himself with communists and Islamists, and has SAID through various means that he intends to destroy this country. I mentioned that he told the Egyptian ambassador that he was and still is a Muslim who supports the Muslim agenda and the Muslim world needed to be patient with him while he got Obamacare passed.

I said the connections to communism were too many to list, but just one example of his EXPRESSED intent to destroy this country - he was a signed member of The New Party, which was set up in part by Francis Fox Piven, co-author with her husband of the Cloward-Piven Plan to destroy the US through orchestrated crisis. The two planks of that plan which required an attorney were the enforcement of the Motor Voter Act (to destroy electoral integrity) and harassment of banks under the Community Reinvestment Act (forced sub-prime lending to destroy our financial system). Both those planks were argued by Barack Obama in the only significant legal actions he took using the Harvard law degree that he got through the funding of the Islamist Saudi prince and logistical help from the communist parents of Bill Ayers.

There is way, way too much for me to say here. My point is that we have no idea whether the guy commanding our troops is a friend or a foe. If we go by what he has SAID AND DONE, he is a foe. And the coup necessary to put him in power tells us he is foreign as well. IOW, he is literally a FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANT in our White House.

Those who thought this was a tee-hee piddly, embarrassing issue need to tell me exactly how they feel knowing that the serious enemies of this country have installed a foreign enemy combatant in our White House, and he may be the only thing standing between us and annihilation by the very people who put him into power.

This is as amusing and piddly as a heart attack.

That’s what I’m saying.


101 posted on 04/06/2013 3:33:57 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“amusing and piddly as a heart attack”

Amen and Amen!!!!


102 posted on 04/06/2013 4:20:54 PM PDT by wxgesr (I want to be the first person to surf on another planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

About Stig and Soebarkah: Surf’s up.


103 posted on 04/06/2013 8:52:50 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; paythefiddler; LucyT; null and void; rolling_stone; bitt; Nachum; Venturer; ...

Here’s some more interesting “findings” over in the Holy Land, Israel!!!

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/israel-science-and-technology-declares-obama-birth-certificate-forged


104 posted on 04/06/2013 8:57:16 PM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: danamco; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; AZ .44 MAG; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

See the link at post #104

105 posted on 04/07/2013 8:46:05 AM PDT by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; LucyT
Butterdezillion, thank you for your tireless and courageous work. You are indeed a true Patriot.

To all in and around the Beltway: House of Representatives, Pentagon, current and retired Military, Patriots of all ilk: Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

"Because he is a foreign enemy combatant who was installed by a coup. As one R presidential primary candidate said within Larry Sellin’s hearing, nobody will touch Obama’s ineligibility because they know the issue goes WAY DEEPER than anybody wants to delve. They KNOW that 2008 was a coup, and they are afraid of exposing who put Obama in power. The people Obama has ALWAYS aligned himself with and that Soros has since 2001 aligned himself with are the WORLD COMMUNISTS and the WORLD ISLAMISTS. What is North Korea (and all her allies)? A communist dictatorship. What is Iran (and all her allies)? An Islamist dictatorship. These are Obama’s FRIENDS!"

" A year after Obama was inaugurated he privately told the Egyptian ambassador that the Muslim world needed to be patient with him because he couldn’t start on the Muslim agenda - which he supports because he was and still is a Muslim - until he got Obamacare passed. (The agenda that all sects of Islam agree on are the destruction of the US and Israel, and the institution of worldwide sharia. And Zawahiri has issued permission for America to be hit first with an EMP, followed by Israel so that Israel will have nobody to defend or help them. Sounds a little bit like North Korea shooting us followed by Iran shooting Israel, doesn’t it?)"

" Ghadaffi had stated in a public speech during the 2008 election that world Muslims were contributing to Obama’s campaign and they hoped Obama wouldn’t forget his Muslim faith and feed his own personal desires when he became President. And it’s been shown that what, 90%? of the people contributing to Obama’s 2012 campaign website (with the credit card verification system deliberately disabled, as it was in 2008) are foreigners. So why did Obama feel like he needed to apologize for not implementing the “Muslim agenda” within his first year of office? You tell me."

" And Obama’s connections to communism are far too long for me to go into here. As to whether it was just AMERICAN Communists, or whether it was WORLD communists, I call to witness Obama’s own words to Medvedev on an open microphone when he thought nobody would hear: After the election I’ll have more flexibility."

" I am painting targets with this series. I am giving Congress members and the public the information they need to demand an investigation. Obama WAS put into office through a coup. He is a foreign enemy combatant, and by his own words he has told us what his intentions are for America. He wants to destroy us and he is working with world communists and world Islamists to do exactly that."

" If that isn’t enough to wake us up and get us off our duffs, then we will sleep through the battle for America’s life and only wake up to the torments caused by the final attack on America - very possibly a super EMP attack."

" Wake up, America! Wake up, Congress! The enemy is in the building and the place is about to go down in flames!"

and

" My point is that if our sworn enemies - communists and Islamists - have the power to hit us it is really, really dangerous that we have as CINC a guy who was installed by a coup and has always aligned himself with communists and Islamists, and has SAID through various means that he intends to destroy this country. I mentioned that he told the Egyptian ambassador that he was and still is a Muslim who supports the Muslim agenda and the Muslim world needed to be patient with him while he got Obamacare passed."

" I said the connections to communism were too many to list, but just one example of his EXPRESSED intent to destroy this country - he was a signed member of The New Party, which was set up in part by Francis Fox Piven, co-author with her husband of the Cloward-Piven Plan to destroy the US through orchestrated crisis. The two planks of that plan which required an attorney were the enforcement of the Motor Voter Act (to destroy electoral integrity) and harassment of banks under the Community Reinvestment Act (forced sub-prime lending to destroy our financial system). Both those planks were argued by Barack Obama in the only significant legal actions he took using the Harvard law degree that he got through the funding of the Islamist Saudi prince and logistical help from the communist parents of Bill Ayers."

" There is way, way too much for me to say here. My point is that we have no idea whether the guy commanding our troops is a friend or a foe. If we go by what he has SAID AND DONE, he is a foe. And the coup necessary to put him in power tells us he is foreign as well. IOW, he is literally a FOREIGN ENEMY COMBATANT in our White House."

" Those who thought this was a tee-hee piddly, embarrassing issue need to tell me exactly how they feel knowing that the serious enemies of this country have installed a foreign enemy combatant in our White House, and he may be the only thing standing between us and annihilation by the very people who put him into power."

Wake Up Beltway! Are you Oathkeepers, or Not? The future of our Sacred Republic is at stake. Please realize the seriousness of this and do something.


106 posted on 04/07/2013 11:06:24 AM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

It’s personal w you & Butter, isn’t it, LL?

Let me ask you something. Have you ever seen anything—even something minor—amiss w Obama’s records? Or in your mind is it a case of pristine, perfectly in-order records across the board, called into question only as an exercise in birther silliness?

Put another way. Do you see Obama as basically honest or dishonest? If you see him as honest...are you serious? After watching him for five or six yrs, you actually believe he is straightforward, aboveboard, truthful & trustworthy? Cite your reasons, please.

If dishonest, then answer this. Do you think he’s often engaged in shading or distorting the truth, or outright lying [as in his repeated statements that the Republicans, not his own WH, proposed sequester], but in one area he’s the model of integrity: i.e.: the area that deals w his birth, his records, his draft registration, etc.?

I’m genuinely curious about all this. I used to be a liberal myself. I was never so far gone, though, that I couldn’t see if a person was overall honest or dishonest. Even during my most passionately liberal days, there were Dems I didn’t like. For example, I recall a Dem primary for governor of MA, and I favored one candidate over the other because he was the more honest od the two.

So I’m asking you, as a former liberal to a current liberal, are you aware of the times when Obama out & out lies? Is that okay w you, ‘because they all do it’? Or do you actually see him as more honest than the typical pol, & therefore above pulling any funny business w, for instance, his draft registration.

Thank you in advance.


107 posted on 04/07/2013 11:40:43 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; Jet Jaguar; Lady Jag; Slings and Arrows; null and void; maggief; Dog; BP2; ...

late to the party ping!


108 posted on 04/07/2013 5:34:48 PM PDT by bitt (The buck rolls downhill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bitt
I responded to her earlier on. But that is ok. Now if all these things can somehow break into the Alphabet News Networks.
But I not going to hold my breath. :)
109 posted on 04/07/2013 6:44:21 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/04/full-interview-sheriff-joe-arpaio-obama-investigator.html

a fun listen....


110 posted on 04/07/2013 7:16:10 PM PDT by bitt (The buck rolls downhill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Republicans had just won a landslide in the 2010 midterms...
...and yet didn't gain control of both houses of Congress. NTSA ping.


111 posted on 04/07/2013 7:39:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void

I’ve waited LONG to hear from them, but then again who of them here voted for the criminal???


112 posted on 04/07/2013 7:48:03 PM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Can you get this to Mike Zullo and Orly???


113 posted on 04/07/2013 7:50:22 PM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Listening as I type. Thanks bitt.


114 posted on 04/07/2013 8:30:04 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Thanks for the ping!


115 posted on 04/07/2013 8:34:03 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bitt
OK. As everyone that listened to the video now understand. Zullo made the statement that there are a number of "VIPs" now in the loop.
Who will have the balls to step forward in a concerted manner to get the ball rolling, remains to be seen.
116 posted on 04/07/2013 9:14:55 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
It’s personal w you & Butter, isn’t it, LL?

Not at all. Can you find anything I have ever said to her that would support such an accusation?

Let me ask you something. Put another way. Do you see Obama as basically honest or dishonest? If you see him as honest...are you serious? After watching him for five or six yrs, you actually believe he is straightforward, aboveboard, truthful & trustworthy? Cite your reasons, please.

I do not see Obama as basically honest, and have never said anything, on this or any other forum, that would support such a claim.

If dishonest, then answer this. Do you think he’s often engaged in shading or distorting the truth, or outright lying [as in his repeated statements that the Republicans, not his own WH, proposed sequester], but in one area he’s the model of integrity: i.e.: the area that deals w his birth, his records, his draft registration, etc.?

There is a difference between lying about his political opponents and masterminding a wide-ranging conspiracy involving hundreds of people that has altered (as Butterdezilion claims) the copies of every newspaper with his birth announcements in libraries around the world. I find some of Butterdezilion's theories far-fetched, and I don't think they add to the credibility of those of us who oppose Obama on political grounds.

So I’m asking you, as a former liberal to a current liberal,

I've been posting of FR since 1998. Please cite some basis for accusing me of being a liberal.

are you aware of the times when Obama out & out lies? Is that okay w you, ‘because they all do it’? Or do you actually see him as more honest than the typical pol, & therefore above pulling any funny business w, for instance, his draft registration. Thank you in advance.

Obama's lies are not OK with me. I have never said that Obama doesn't lie; of course he does.

I am a lawyer. My posts on eligibility threads (including this one) are almost 100% on the legal issues involved. My predictions about what courts would do have been 100% right for as long as I have been posting on eligibility threads (which has been more than four years now.

I have no idea if Obama's draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.

117 posted on 04/08/2013 11:11:40 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Cold Case Posse Supporter

“I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.”

And you know this how?

How about if the “discrepancy” was that Barry NEVER filed for the draft because he knowingly hid a foreign birth and was using both a foreign nationality at college and a forged CT SS# identity and was a member of Ayers and Dorhn’s terrorist bank robbing gang?

If it can be proved in criminal court that Barry gained the presidency using a forged BC to hide his foreign birth, Barry may well have “failed to qualify” as president SCOTUS might rule that Barry doesn’t even qualify for impeachment having never actually been president.

Do you know how SCOTUS will rule in such a case of identity fraud of which the selective service forgery might be a part?


118 posted on 04/08/2013 12:45:05 PM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I based most of what I wrote on a post I read on ObamaConspiracy. Some time back I was curious as to how the most extreme Obama-supporters/defenders handled certain issues & questions. I spent about a wk touring some of the most radically pro-Obama sites on the web. On ObamaConspiracy I came upon the post of someone who talked about what an idiot he was making of a certain longtime Freeper. I followed the link, which led directly to an exchange between you, LL, & the particular Freeper in question. None of this struck me as something a conservative would do, hence my inferences.


119 posted on 04/08/2013 3:17:06 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Don’t believe everything you read on the internet. I have NEVER posted on Obama Conspiracy.


120 posted on 04/08/2013 3:23:45 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Okay, let’s say I believe you. So to make what I read true, somebody on ObamaConspiracy observed the exchange between you & the Freeper in question. He/she thought you were doing such a good job, he/she decided to take credit for it. So he/she bragged about the exchange on OC, & then posted a link that actually led not to something w which he/she was personally involved, but rather to the give-&-take between you, LL, & the party in question.

I suppose this could have happened, but it seems a bit of a stretch. Fwiw.


121 posted on 04/08/2013 3:29:02 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

I have no idea what you read. I have never posted on (or even visited) Obama Conspiracy. Believe what you want.


122 posted on 04/08/2013 4:59:18 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

“Believe what you want.”

You felt the need to give me permission?

Well since I don’t know you well enough to know how honest you are, I’ll believe what I saw w my own eyes.

Going back to your prior reply. How on earth can you brag about making correct predictions on eligibility threads? That’s like saying you predicted the outcome of loaded dice. The court system is overwhelmingly liberal—something conservatives learned decades ago. We expect nothing from it but a periodic swift kick in the teeth, & it never fails to deliver.

& then there’s this gem:

“I have no idea if Obama’s draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.”

Did you actually type that? If so, does the plaque on your door read ‘CA DNC’? Because otherwise it makes no sense. A human being cares that Obama’s draft registration is a complete & glaring fake. You don’t even have to be a conservative to care. It means the man is a fraud. Liberals may like fellow liberals, but not even they like complete frauds. It’s human nature to dislike a con artist. Even if one temporarily suits your purpose, underneath it all you feel disgust.

Yet all you care about is whether a blatantly faked draft card will Obama kicked out of office. Really. What a weird, hinky reaction. If that was my response to the worst forgery on record, I wouldn’t put it out there in the public eye. I’d think it, but at least have the good sense not to post it.


123 posted on 04/09/2013 10:24:04 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
How on earth can you brag about making correct predictions on eligibility threads? That’s like saying you predicted the outcome of loaded dice. The court system is overwhelmingly liberal—something conservatives learned decades ago. We expect nothing from it but a periodic swift kick in the teeth, & it never fails to deliver.

Orly Taitz now has two eligibility cases pending before judges appointed by Ronald Reagan. Those cases will be dismissed, not because those judges are liberals or because the cases are fixed, but because of well-settled principles of law, including standing, mootness and the political question doctrine.

& then there’s this gem: “I have no idea if Obama’s draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.” Did you actually type that? If so, does the plaque on your door read ‘CA DNC’? Because otherwise it makes no sense. A human being cares that Obama’s draft registration is a complete & glaring fake. You don’t even have to be a conservative to care.

Apparently, reading comprehension is not your strong suit (odd, for someone who claims to be a writer). I never said I didn't care if his Selective Service registration is forged; I said I don't post about it because it is outside my expertise as a lawyer. On the eligibility threads (and most threads, for that matter), I post about legal issues because my professional background gives me something to add to the discussion.

124 posted on 04/10/2013 2:01:55 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Only a liberal believes court cases today are decided on the law. Conservatives have seen for decades now that ideology trumps all else. Maybe if you had caught me twenty years ago you might be able to make me believe the outrageous lie that judges decide cases on merits. Even then I would have been skeptical. Today it just makes me wonder. Do you even believe this stuff yourself???

“& then there’s this gem: “I have no idea if Obama’s draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.” Did you actually type that? If so, does the plaque on your door read ‘CA DNC’? Because otherwise it makes no sense. A human being cares that Obama’s draft registration is a complete & glaring fake. You don’t even have to be a conservative to care.

Apparently, reading comprehension is not your strong suit (odd, for someone who claims to be a writer). I never said I didn’t care if his Selective Service registration is forged; I said I don’t post about it because it is outside my expertise as a lawyer. On the eligibility threads (and most threads, for that matter), I post about legal issues because my professional background gives me something to add to the discussion.”

So now it is ‘reading comprehension’ not to see that you meant the opposite of what you said? I.e.: to see how much you care about Obama’s lying, cheating, forging, law-breaking ways when all you actually said was that he’d be in no legal jeopardy.

Your definition of reading comprehension: mind-reading. (If in fact anything of that sort [i.e.: concern about Obama’s fundamental lack of integrity] was actually in your mind to begin w—& there’s no indication it was.

You want credit for things you didn’t say & never said or even suggested. Worse, you blame me for not knowing about all these things you didn’t say & have never said. That is sick. Really, really sick.


125 posted on 04/10/2013 3:33:54 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

obumpa


126 posted on 04/10/2013 6:53:08 PM PDT by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-126 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson