Posted on 05/20/2013 1:13:14 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
"In two weeks the naysayers will find out just how wrong they have been" - Mike Zullo
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
“The legal standard for crimes is “beyond a reasonable doubt”, and Zullo has said what he has surpasses that standard.”
Then he should go to court TODAY and file charges. With thousands of DAs in America, surely 1 out of thousands would file charges, if presented evidence.
That is why so many on this thread are saying “Ho-Hum”! If Zullo has evidence that proves criminal activity beyond a reasonable doubt, he should either A) stay silent until he is ready to press charges, or B) press charges. By saying, ‘I’ve got proof, but I’m going to wait 14 days before I show you my secret super duper proof’, he looks like someone running a scam.
How many times have we heard this before? And how many times has Zullo dropped a turd on the floor and called it a gold necklace? Life is not a Ludlum novel. There isn’t a giant conspiracy that includes Limbaugh & Palin & Mark Levin & every member of Congress & the US court system.
We few, we happy few, we birther band of brothers;
For he to-day that believes Zullo with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition:
And gentlemen in Birtherland now a-bed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That believed with us on 20 May!
The person authorized by law to verify facts - and required to certify that verification - disagrees with the people spouting off to the media.
So who you gonna believe? The person who is bound by law, authorized to make the disclosure, and swears that he has kept the law.... or the same windbags who have been caught not only lying to the media but also going so far as to fabricate multiple documents in order to deceive the public?
The security background that doesn’t match that used by the HDOH is a dead giveaway that the White House image is not a scan of what the HDOH sent them.
Your continued ad hominems and refusals to address the real evidence makes you the equivalent of a gnat hovering around the eyes. Lotta people like that around here, and it spoils their credibility on everything.
there are those in the establishment on our side who hate this issue as much or more than do the Democrats.
Gee. I wonder why that is? Do you think it might be because you people have never done anything but make our side look like a bunch of nuts?
I think it is obvious by now that Obama has the IRS, FBI & CIA all ready and willing to do his bidding. He doesn’t NEED to manipulate a PDF file. He could have the forgery done on paper dating from 1961, by experts, and entered into Hawaii’s files. He could have the microfilm replaced with microfilm showing his birth certificate forgery was there all along.
The government makes birth certificates. When you control the government, you don’t need to manipulate images. You manipulate the official record, and then forever and for all time the official record shows your forgery is real.
But one can be certain it is a fake from a scan.
For example, if I gave you a scan of Obama's selective service registration card "that he signed in 1980", but the actual form he signed isn't the 1980 version of the SS registration form, but one that wasn't issued until 1995, you can be certain it wasn't signed in 1980, can't you?
So based on that garbage rational there is no way to claim the image at the following link is not authentic:
http://www.blogseitb.us/basque_boise/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/obama-birth-certificate.jpg
Amazing. Simply amazing the lengths of twisted logic used to avoid the facts.
It is not at all possible to authenticate anything from an digital image. That is true. But the signs of fraud will come through in digital images.
You can not use a digital image as both a shield and sword. Either show the real, actual document or go away. The digital games are nearly over.
BTW, birth certificates are secondary citizenship evidence. Passport and passport records are primary. Lets see those!
Interestingly enough, when a reporter went to look for the original microfilm way back when, that one roll was missing. When he checked back a few days later it had been found.
The 'found' roll, unlike the rest of the rolls from that time period was pristine, no scratches, dust, fingerprints or wear.
This was reported on the Long Thread. Look it up if you don't believe me.
Ping to self.
“The security background that doesn’t match that used by the HDOH is a dead giveaway that the White House image is not a scan of what the HDOH sent them.”
Look at this wiki article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossy_compression
Look at the dog pictures on the right. See how as the image is compressed more and more, you lose details.
This is what happened to the green background layer.
The text layers were compressed using a different method so they would lose less detail since for most scanned documents you can afford to lose detail in the images and graphics but you want text to remain sharp and clear.
Flushing someone out might be a reason.
> chuckle <<
But somebody within the government foiled that plan, as evidenced by the fact that they had to use a forged document even after the HDOH gave them a certified copy of the record the HDOH has.
The CIA and FBI both have whistleblowers. Obama doesn’t own everybody. Close, but not everybody. And when critical people balk at the crimes, Obama’s got troubles.
Somebody at the HDOH balked. Think it through and I think it’ll make sense to you. Just know that the security paper on the White House image doesn’t match what the HDOH actually uses, and that will tell you all you need to know.
You’re grasping at straws. You don’t know what is different about the security background that the White House image uses. Neither did the forger, and that is Obama’s problem. lol
No, I hadn’t seen that.
There are several things in there that I thought were funny. And the whole context adds to the humor in those footnotes you quoted.
More importantly, he has the Hawaii DOH (the guys who make Hawaiian BCs) in his pocket.
Zullo *has* ‘put-up’ many times.
Solid information has to be coupled with distribution of that information in order for it to be effective. For the information to be accepted, people have to be brought in to give more gravitas to the information.
If you were looking for information alone, delivered in a speedy fashion, you already got it many times over.
Zullo *has* ‘put-up’ many times.
Solid information has to be coupled with distribution of that information in order for it to be effective. For the information to be accepted, people have to be brought in to give more gravitas to the information.
If you were looking for information alone, delivered in a speedy fashion, you already got it many times over.
Zullo *has* ‘put-up’ many times.
Solid information has to be coupled with distribution of that information in order for it to be effective. For the information to be accepted, people have to be brought in to give more gravitas to the information.
If you were looking for information alone, delivered in a speedy fashion, you already got it many times over.
“the actual form he signed isn’t the 1980 version of the SS registration form, but one that wasn’t issued until 1995, you can be certain it wasn’t signed in 1980, can’t you?”
If in fact that was the case. Nut then it would appear that several people used 1995 forms back in 1980.
Bruce Henderson’s form and Darrell Oniwa’s form are from the same post office as Obama’s.
at this rate, they’ll have him tossed for being ineligible by 2018
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
