Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doomsday Devices Difficult to Make, Obtain and Use, Experts Say
AP ^ | Friday, September 28, 2001

Posted on 09/28/2001 1:04:33 AM PDT by JohnHuang2



Doomsday Devices Difficult to Make, Obtain and Use, Experts Say

Published: Sep 28, 2001

A look at "weapons of mass destruction" - devices that have the potential of killing thousands:

-Chemical weapons: These are considered the most likely to be used in a terrorist attack because they are easier to make and can kill people quickly. They include nerve agents such as sarin and VX, blister agents such as mustard gas, and cyanide. Making and storing them in any quantity still require the technical capability, roughly, of a pharmaceutical company, experts say.

-Biological weapons: These cause disease. Anthrax is considered a likely candidate for an attack. Effects can be minimized with quarantines and quick medical care.

-Radiological weapons: These spread radioactive material over a wide area. Unlikely to kill anyone quickly, they will instead cause long-term problems, such as cancer, in an affected population. They could also render an area uninhabitable for a long period. They don't have the mass, rapid killing effect that terrorists seek.

-Nuclear weapons: No terrorist group is believed to be able to develop these, although there are fears that one could be obtained from Russia. Reports of suitcase-sized nuclear weapons have not been verified.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/28/2001 1:04:33 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Nice choices we have
2 posted on 09/28/2001 1:07:15 AM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Radiological weapons: These spread radioactive material over a wide area. Unlikely to kill anyone quickly, they will instead cause long-term problems, such as cancer, in an affected population. They could also render an area uninhabitable for a long period. They don't have the mass, rapid killing effect that terrorists seek.

If they detonated one of these on the top of a skyscraper, it could send radiation all over a city like New York. People would flee in droves, there would be mass looting, people would be reluctant to return--the terrorists could do long-term damage with one of those.

3 posted on 09/28/2001 1:08:46 AM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
It's been known for years that dozens of former USSR suitcase nukes are unaccounted for. I hope this is a lot of hot air like so many 'known' items.
4 posted on 09/28/2001 3:00:19 AM PDT by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
NBC/ABC Warfare Survival Skills Links

Tiny Nukes-- the backpack threat

5 posted on 09/28/2001 3:30:54 AM PDT by backhoe (Has that clinton "legacy" made you feel *safer* yet? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson