Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
i'll agree with your position in this post provided you change " north" to "abolitionists".

most scholars would tell you that the VAST majority of northerners cared NOTHING about slavery, the plight of the slaves OR the expansion of slavery in 1860 AND they certainly would NOT have prosecuted a war (that KILLED a MILLION people) to hasten the end of a dying institution.

the populus of the north WAS willing to fight a war to "preserve the union".

free dixie,sw

50 posted on 10/04/2004 8:02:33 AM PDT by stand watie ( being a damnyankee is no better than being a racist. damnyankee is a LEARNED prejudice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: stand watie

The Sectional Crises were about slavery. The Sections were North and South. The South wanted it in new territories. The North said no.


51 posted on 10/04/2004 8:25:48 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

I’m from Boston, and I can tell you I support the view that Civil War should have been avoided and the South should have been able to secede. My guess is that after a few short years, everyone would have realized it was a wake up call and figured it would have been best to keep our differences within our own states and merge back together for the good of the nation as a whole. So don’t assume everyone in the northeast is an elitist or refuses to see things logically :)


144 posted on 07/30/2009 12:08:48 PM PDT by frankazzurro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson