Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPUBLICAN LIBERTY CAUCUS POSITION STATEMENT
RLC Website ^ | December 8, 2000 | Republican Liberty Caucus

Posted on 07/24/2002 3:47:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

REPUBLICAN LIBERTY CAUCUS
POSITION STATEMENT

As adopted by the General Membership of the Republican Liberty Caucus at its Biannual Meeting held December 8, 2000.  

BE IT RESOLVED that the Republican Liberty Caucus endorses the following principles:

1.0 FEDERALISM

1.1 The power of the federal government should be limited, as per the tenth amendment to the U. S. Constitution.

2.0 EDUCATION

2.1 The U. S. Department of Education should be abolished, leaving education decision making at the state, local or personal level.
2.2 Parents have the right to spend their money on the school or method of schooling they deem appropriate for their children.

3.0 HEALTH CARE

3.1 Free market health care alternatives, such as medical savings accounts, should be available to everyone, including senior citizens.
3.2 The federal entitlement to Medicare should be abolished, leaving health care decision making regarding the elderly at the state, local, or personal level.

4.0 TAXATION

4.1 The tax system of the United States should be overhauled.
4.2 There should be a national debate discussing various alternative means of taxation including but not limited to a single flat income tax, repealing the income tax and replacing it with a national sales tax, and reducing spending to the point where the income tax can be repealed without the need to replace it with a national sales tax or any other form of taxation.
4.3 The capital gains tax should be *eliminated*.
4.4 The inheritance tax should be *eliminated*.
4.5 The new tax system should be implemented *promptly*.

5.0 WELFARE

5.1 The U. S. Department of Health and Human Services should be abolished, leaving decision making on welfare and related matters at the state, local or personal level. All Americans have the right to keep the fruits of their labor to support themselves, their families and whatever charities they so choose, without interference from the federal government.
5.2 All able-bodied Americans have the responsibility to support themselves and their families.

6.0 CRIMINAL JUSTICE

6.1 Every American has the right to keep and bear arms. We affirm our support for the second amendment of the U. S. Constitution.
6.2 All people, regardless of position in the public or private sector, should be held equally accountable under the law.
6.3 The *only* litmus test for Supreme Court or other judges should be their determination to accurately interpret, not amend, the Constitution. Judges have *no* authority to make new law.

7.0 CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM

7.1 Election campaigns should not be subsidized by tax payers.
7.2 No individual should be compelled to support a political candidate he or she does not support. Government should not empower trade unions to collect funds from their members for use as political contributions without their members' expressed consent.
7.3 All limits on campaign contributions should be eliminated.
7.4 There should be full and timely public disclosure of all the sources and amounts of all campaign contributions upon their receipt.

8.0 FEDERAL BUDGET

8.1 There should be an amendment to the U. S. Constitution to require a balanced budget, provided it includes a supermajority requirement to raise taxes and provided it does not empower the judiciary to unilaterally raise taxes.
8.2 Honest accounting dictates that all federal expenditures should be on budget.
8.3 Each budget should be derived based upon the justification for and needs of each program, with no program being either budgeted for or increased automatically.

9.0 GOVERNMENT REFORM

9.1 The U. S. Department of Commerce should be abolished, per the tenth amendment of the U. S. Constitution.
9.2 The National Endowment for the Arts should be abolished, per the tenth amendment of the U. S. Constitution.
9.3 The National Endowment for the Humanities should be abolished, per the tenth amendment of the U. S. Constitution.
9.4 The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development should be abolished, per the tenth amendment of the U. S. Constitution.
9.5 Subsidies to agricultural and other businesses should be eliminated.
9.6 Corporate taxes should be eliminated simultaneously and proportionally with the elimination of subsidies to businesses.
9.7 Recommendations by the Grace Commission and the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) should be reviewed and implemented, where possible, beginning immediately.
9.8 Privatization of government assets, management and services should be implemented for cost-effectiveness wherever applicable.

10.0 TRADE

10.1 The U. S. government should inhibit neither the exportation of U. S. goods and services worldwide, nor the importation of goods and services.
10.2 The United States should not be answerable to any governing body outside the United States for its trade policy.

11.0 DEFENSE

11.1 U. S. military should be deployed only where there is a clear threat to vital U. S. interests and only with the consent of the U. S. Congress.
11.2 It is the duty of the federal government to provide a system to defend against missile attacks.
11.3 No branch of the military should be put in harm's way without a clear entrance and exit strategy and a goal, which when achieved, constitutes victory.
11.4 U. S military personnel should always be under U. S. command.
11.5 U. S. armed forces should be all-volunteer.
11.6 Military draft registration should be eliminated.
11.7 Foreign aid is often more harmful than helpful and should be curtailed.

12.0 PROPERTY RIGHTS

12.1 The government should not take private property without just compensation.
12.2 All unconstitutional regulation of private property should be repealed.

13.0 DRUGS

13.1 While recognizing the harm that drug abuse causes society, we also recognize that government drug policy has been ineffective and has led to frightening abuses of the Bill of Rights which could affect the personal freedom of any American. We, therefore, support alternatives to the War on Drugs.
13.2 Per the tenth amendment to the U. S. Constitution, matters such as drugs should be handled at the state or personal level.
13.3 All laws which give license to violate the Bill of Rights should be repealed.

Entered into the record December 8, 2000


TOPICS: Issues
KEYWORDS: banglist; positionstatement; rlc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-262 next last
To: logos
You make a good point.

George Mason University Professor of Economics Walter Williams writes that the eighteen duties mandated to the federal government by our Constitution would account for approximately just one-third of the federal budget. The other two-thirds of the federal budget is, therefore, "extra-Constitutional" spending -- not authorized functions of the federal government. In other words, two-thirds of the hard earned money we are forced to send to Washington every year is spent by the federal government with no Constitutional authority.

Just as starters, I call for the federal government to display the same type of budgetary responsibility we would expect from a corporation and have a 15% across the board (except military) lay-off. Probably a 10% lay-off for each of the next five years thereafter would tend to bring the budget back in line. It would do a lot to promote Liberty and do a great deal for the economy, too.

161 posted on 07/26/2002 12:47:12 PM PDT by Doug Fiedor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
This means replacing them with Republicans.

That is where you always get hung up Jim. Replacing them with Republicans who are precisely the same (or worse) than the Democrats you are replacing.

Everything you stand for in the RLC info you posted above, is totally undermined by that ONE statement. They will NEVER, EVER do the things that you want in the RLC plan. NEVER, EVER.

Voting for Republicans instead of Democrats even if they are the same, is the most illogical thing you could possibly do. Your hopes are never to be realized with that strategy.

It seems hopeless to get you to change your mind. You are stuck, and they know it. They win, you lose, the country loses. GWB and his ilk are laughing at you. (So are Gephart, Clinton and Dashle) Sad as hell. Regards TJ

162 posted on 07/26/2002 12:49:08 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
"You won't declare abortion wrong, etc."

Are you, by the remotest possibility, confusing me with another toenail?

163 posted on 07/26/2002 12:49:33 PM PDT by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Well, it's my choice.
164 posted on 07/26/2002 12:54:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: toenail
I am talking about the Libertarian party, not individual libertarians.
165 posted on 07/26/2002 12:56:05 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Everything you stand for in the RLC info you posted above, is totally undermined by that ONE statement. They will NEVER, EVER do the things that you want in the RLC plan. NEVER, EVER.

I can demonstrate how wrong you are with four simple words about the RLC and its ironclad commitment to the Constitution and liberty:

Ron Paul, Founding Chair
166 posted on 07/26/2002 1:12:20 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Well, it's my choice.

You're right Jim, for now.

If you stay with your strategy, you will wake up one morning, and you won't have any choices left. It's inevitable, your only hope is that it will occur after we are gone. Which of course leaves our kids and grandkids in slavery.

167 posted on 07/26/2002 1:24:53 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Clearly, you missed my point entirely. You must have missed the context or who I was referring to.

Please reread the whole exchange between JR and myself if you want to understand what I said.

168 posted on 07/26/2002 1:27:14 PM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Doug Fiedor
What a fabulous summation of the RLC's foundational principles. They are, indeed, 100% aligned with the nation's foundational principles as a federation of sovereign states with very limited central powers (e.g. only as allowed by the Constitution). The Federal Government did not create the states-- it was the other way around. This point is lost on probably 90% of Americans today, and that sad fact is fundamental to the steady erosion of our liberty and why it is tolerated by the citizenry.

One thing we must keep in mind is that the march of socialism has benefited greatly from the patience and discipline brought to Marxism by its Fabian and Gramscian believers and their useful tools. Their spirit of patient incrementalism is a strategy that we are well-advised to emulate. The single-issue voters among us should think carefully about that.
169 posted on 07/26/2002 1:45:06 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Well, we'll just have to disagree on this point and let it go at that.
Thanks, Jim
170 posted on 07/26/2002 1:56:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson; Jim Robinson; Doug Fiedor
Clearly, you missed my point entirely. You must have missed the context or who I was referring to. Please reread the whole exchange between JR and myself if you want to understand what I said.

Sorry. Seems to me you specifically stated that the Republicans would not accomplish any of the RLC's goals. In rebuttal, I gave an example of an exemplar of the RLC who is also one of the most vocal Republican Congressmen today. He's the lone voice of the Constitution now, but there are more coming thanks to the RLC's growing influence among patriotic voters who until now have had no voice and no leverage in the latter-day Republican party. The RLC's effectiveness in electing liberty-minded individuals at all levels is detailed in several other examples in this thread. It's exciting stuff!

The key thing to realize is that we are not working to "convert" the RINOs but to wrench the Party towards its foundational small-government, Constitution-respecting original principles by attracting and giving a voice to disaffected voters who are sitting out elections or escaping to third parties. Because when they do so, they either impotently toss their vote away or--worse--elect a Clinton (as in 1992) or give the Senate to a Daschle by squeaking socialists into office by the narrowest of margins (as happened in Washington and New Mexico in 2000).

Meanwhile, RINOs are the way they are because they crave political success. They will adapt as "our side" gains its voice. I hold out little hope that some of the politicians you reference will suddenly sprout credible Constitutional credentials, but they're smart enough to sing along as we steer the chorus.

Frankly, I think you and I agree on at least 90% of the issues. What we seem to not agree-on is the viability of the GOP as a vehicle for liberty-minded candidates who respect the Constitution and foundational principles of the nation. I say emphatically yes to the idea of molding the GOP back to its little-l libertarian roots, and in the thread I just referenced there's abundant evidence supporting that position.
171 posted on 07/26/2002 2:19:50 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I want to thank Jim Robinson for allowiing this partnership with the rlc. I hope that as time goes on, we can both work together in a coalition. Perhaps even we can hold joint conventions. Here in Florida we have the RLC in regional groups. We have the South Florida Regional Group and now the Central Florida regional group. As chair of the Florida RLC I plan to help start a North Florida regional group. I am proud to be in the RLC and work with Free Republic. He philosophy of the RLC is consistent with my own. I came to this country seeking freedom back in 1961 when Castro took over Cuba and I have seen what it is like to lose your rights, property and so on Thanks again for this partnership Jim. Al Gutierrez Chairman Florida RLC .
172 posted on 07/26/2002 3:00:29 PM PDT by alfons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I want to thank Jim Robinson for allowiing this partnership with the rlc. I hope that as time goes on, we can both work together in a coalition. Perhaps even we can hold joint conventions. Here in Florida we have the RLC in regional groups. We have the South Florida Regional Group and now the Central Florida regional group. As chair of the Florida RLC I plan to help start a North Florida regional group. I am proud to be in the RLC and work with Free Republic. He philosophy of the RLC is consistent with my own. I came to this country seeking freedom back in 1961 when Castro took over Cuba and I have seen what it is like to lose your rights, property and so on Thanks again for this partnership Jim. Al Gutierrez Chairman Florida RLC .
173 posted on 07/26/2002 3:03:01 PM PDT by alfons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
One thing we must keep in mind is that the march of socialism has benefited greatly from the patience and discipline brought to Marxism by its Fabian and Gramscian believers and their useful tools. Their spirit of patient incrementalism is a strategy that we are well-advised to emulate. The single-issue voters among us should think carefully about that.


Wow, I haven't even seen the name Gramsci written since I wrote a paper on Italian fascism in high school. Such things were still fresh in people's minds way back then and at least part of the class knew who he was.

Not so anymore, eh? Most people today don't even know what fascism was -- except to know that it wasn't good and they probably don't want any here. That's why they do not recognize that we already have strong tendencies in that direction. Very strong!

Same with socialism. Few Americans realize that there are different types of socialism. In the communist type, government outwardly owns all of the means of production. In the present type, government uses licensing and regulation to tightly control all of the means of production, agriculture, service, and sales. Government regulation, then, becomes the de facto standard for quality and performance and free market competition is greatly diminished. Look to medial care and the automobile industry as prime examples.

Of course, we all know about that part of socialism that concerns the redistribution of wealth. Yet, we tend to accept that simply because most of the nation grew up under that system and cannot imagine how life would be without big government as the nanny.

We have even given up our God to the alter of politically correct socialism. Today's "Christians" sit back in near silence as those on the far left continually defame our most personal beliefs. We have also become so complacent we now allow the socialist controlled government schools to teach our children the acceptance and practice of all sorts of deviant behaviors we know in our hearts to be improper.

The point is, they are winning. They keep the black population in a constant state of agitation against the white. They pit the Jews against the Christians. They protect the belligerents in society, explain away the terrorist helpers and disgrace all of our national heroes.

Most Americans, in turn, sit back and grumble a little, but say protesting is useless. Worse, when some others actually try to make a difference, instead of joining in to help, they make fun of the attempt -- calling it futile and impossible.

Except, it is far from impossible. Give me ten good political activists in each State and I will elect you a president. If we have three or four active RLC groups in each State -- active being the operative word here -- we will have significant change by the next presidential election.

Or, we can just sit back like many people are doing and accept our fate, as determined by that small group that is the socialist controlling force in this society.

Two points are indisputable: The socialists can be stopped by just a handful of good political activists simply because this Liberty thing gets infectious when presented to people properly. And, because the Republican Liberty Caucus is a club, we can also have fun while doing something constructive.

174 posted on 07/26/2002 3:03:48 PM PDT by Doug Fiedor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
There are liobertarians who are Christian who oppose abortion like I do. Look at the Lord Acton Institute for example. That is a Catholic libertarian group. Heck, even in the Libertarian Party you have Libertarian For Life lead by Doris Gordon. Libertarians come from different philosophies or factions but one thing that we have in common is limited government, property rights, strict construction of the Constitution the Supreme Law Of the Land, we are pro second ammendment. There are other Christian Libertarian Groups also.
175 posted on 07/26/2002 3:09:37 PM PDT by alfons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
good stuff
176 posted on 07/26/2002 3:13:12 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
no tom... most of us are just tired of being slammed as "libertines" and "drug addicts" or "smut lovers" over anything that leans towards individualism, self reliance and the like as we see it, under the constitution...

STATISM is a powerful drug to those who dream of utopia made in the likeness of their own ideologies... and INDIVIDUALISM has become anathema to what used to be called conservatism...

177 posted on 07/26/2002 3:18:42 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"That won't fly with social, moral and Christian conservatives"

That is probably true, but who cares? Not me. As soon as you moved that word "social" to the front of any list of qualities, you negated any references to "conservative" that follow. SOCIALISTS will adapt ANY ideology that they can use to move into governing a utopian society ir their UNIQUE and twisted view of it. Even so-called "christians".

The same authority that folks surrender to the feds for one area are WITHOUT exception, used in unexpected ways to our detriment. Abortion should return to being a state regulated issue, as there were far less abortions then, than there are now.

We need to get FEDERAL government out of EVERYTHING but its enumerated powers. It is time to end the illicit affair our residents have had with federalism. It has adulterated the fiduciary rights and responsibilities between sovereign states and their residents.

First degree murder and it's corollaries, are still all defined under regional and state laws. It should be the same for MOST items that have now been federalized... drugs, sex, guns, alcohol, abortion, and so on... WE need to keep them regulated at state and local levels where special interests cannot concentrate their efforts so easily and the electorate lives within driving distance of the legislatures... and leave the big guns of federalism for INTERNATIONAL issues of security, economics and trade...

The founders never envisioned the "interstate commerce" clause being used to regulate such wide ranges of issues as medical proceedures... they were right in that LACK of vision. They just couldn't see it then, and we shouldn't now.




178 posted on 07/26/2002 3:33:57 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
there are a lot of folks that want to see their version of biblical christianity imposed on the rest of us... at a federal level....

THEY say they are socially conservatives... I think what begins with "social" is a socialist world view regardless of what noun or words follow.

The taliban were social conservatives who managed to get THEIR view of the KORAN instituted as laws against their fellow man... It's evil no matter who does it though... and we need to return to such thinking in america.
179 posted on 07/26/2002 3:40:57 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Please cut down on the vitriol...
180 posted on 07/26/2002 4:04:51 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson