No problem bub. I’ve seen what passes for logic for you, and it makes me glad to see that you think I’m a nut.
How many thousands of terrorists have we killed in Iraq? Do you think it was better for them to die on Iraqi soil, or wait in the wings for their next act of terrorism?
I’m sure Ron may think Iraq’s leaders are bad. And there are probably some good reasons for thinking so. None the less, we are better off today if Al Qaeda and the Taliban networks have been destroyed, or even desimated.
If you can’t understand this, why would I get weak in the knees that you don’t like my position on this?
Ron and Osama Bin Laden share a desire for the U.S. to get out of Iraq. If it were a good thing for the terrorists, Osama wouldn’t want that would he?
Oh well, there is that...
You know, I could point out that Osama actually wanted us to go in to Iraq (part of his "7-point plan" for world domination). But then, you'll just say that we're "engaging him on his own turf" or whatever. No matter what the situation, you can always justify Foreign Interventionism. You'll just change your argument based on your beliefs, facts be damned.
It would never occur to you to just let Shi'ites and Sunnis kill eachother. Never occur to you that we might be better off just keeping our feet out of the snake pit, and letting the vipers kill eachother.
It occurred to Reagan. But somehow, you'll never see the wisdom in that.