Actually, we haven’t taken action in the Americas so Ron hasn’t addressed the issue.
He is on record regarding our operations in Iraq. And if he can’t see any reason for being in a nation that swore to help destroy our nation, gave $25k rewards to the families of suicide bombers in Israel, started a war that cost about 500,000 lives on both sides with Iran, took over another nation Kuwait, attacked Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Israel, killed upwards of 300,000 more of his citizens through torture, gased the Kurds, was raping abusing and killing women for the sport of it, and was just fine with his sons feeding their husbands through a wood chipper feet first, it’s kindof hard to acknowledge any type of verbal victory on your part for denying he wouldn’t have supported Reagan’s efforts in Granada.
Seriously, what kind of medications do you have to be on to think Paul would give a pass to what took place in Iraq, but would approve of stoping what was going on in Granada?
The War on Terrorism was concieved as a reaction to a violent attack on our soil. The action in Granada was concieved as a preemptive strike against those who looked like they might hurt our students, and develop a base in the Americas.
Are you telling me Paul would support Granada? LOL, you believe that?
Ron Paul has never repudiated the Monroe Doctrine.
In 1983, Ronald Reagan -- executing the Monroe Doctrine -- notified Congress of the Grenada Intervention, but did not consult Congress.
Congressman Ron Paul lodged no protest.
Considering he protests everything else that the Government does which is unconstitutional, his silence on Ronald Reagan's execution of the Monroe Doctrine does not help your case.
Which is no case at all, of course. President Reagan executed the Monroe Doctrine. Congress was notified. Ron Paul offered no objection.
Case closed.