[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

If Ron were your normal Republican candidate, the party unified and all, I would agree that the 33% of that demographic would be important. Ron would have to pull the conservative party members along, and IMO he’d lose ten times the votes there that he would gain in the group you address.

No, he won't.

Against Hillary, you'll vote for Ron Paul in the Generals.

You don't have to like it; you just have to vote against Hillary.

And, if Ron Paul is the Nominee... you will.

(Heck... some small, individualist part of your conscience that hates paying Federal taxes may even enjoy it).

[DoughtyOne]

There were a number of folks talking to you on this thread, and of those who objected to your premises, none of them expressed to you firmly enough what I am about to say to you. I will not be voting for Ron Paul. I consider our War on Terrorism to be very important. Hillary Clinton would come closer to defending this nation against agression that Ron Paul would. Sorry, that’s the way I see it. I absolutely loathe Hillary Clinton, but I would sooner leave the top spot blank than vote for Ron Paul.

You guys are severely misjudging the political climate if you think Ron Paul will ever be President of the United States.

If you were making this play regarding our Bosnia Kosovo actions, I would seriously consider backing your play. When it comes to Iraq, I cannot help but think you folks have a gene missing or something.

Take care.