[Tears of a Clown]

I doubt that.

According to one his aides, Paul was strongly AGAINST the use of force of afghanistan. And only begrudgingly signed it when his staff threatened to resign.

That doesn’t sound like a person who takes the war on terror seriously. It DOES sound like a person who will sit on his hands like bill clintonm, look the other way when we are attacked again and again by islamofacists, and pass off another 9/11 to be dealt with by someone who is actually strong on terror, like Dubya.

[Tears of a Clown]

By “signed it” i meant to say “voted for it”

[George W. Bush]

According to one his aides, Paul was strongly AGAINST the use of force of afghanistan.

An aide who went flako, offended all the Republicans and Libertarians he once worked with, injects himself into a lot of different fights, then claims credit for other people's political work, alternates between trying to destroy Republicans and Libertarians. Oh, and he wrote a bogus language-learning book that's a laughingstock at Amazon and he advocates legalizing prostitution, especially for our overseas troops to enjoy, much as he brags about all the whores he patronized as a sailor. He also claims to be a combat veteran because a ship he served on was attacked after he had already been transferred elsewhere.

Eric Dondero. We're hoping he runs against Ron Paul.

Ron Paul voted for the authorization of action in Afghanistan. He also introduced a declaration of war and he offered legislation to issue letters of marque and reprisal against the Afghan warlords and against al-Qaeda's leaders. That doesn't sound too opposed to me.

Now, he certainly was against the war in Iraq although he did offer a declaration of war against them as well, to strengthen the administration's hand if we did go to war. It is the correct action.

[Calvinist_Dark_Lord]

I doubt that.

According to one his aides, Paul was strongly AGAINST the use of force of afghanistan. And only begrudgingly signed it when his staff threatened to resign.

Eric Dondero.

If you choose to believe the word of a wacko who has offended anybody he's had any prolonged dealings with and was fired by Ron Paul for offenses that Paul could not tolerate from staff, be my guest, you're beyond help.

That doesn’t sound like a person who takes the war on terror seriously. It DOES sound like a person who will sit on his hands like bill clintonm, look the other way when we are attacked again and again by islamofacists, and pass off another 9/11 to be dealt with by someone who is actually strong on terror, like Dubya.

Paul takes the supposed war on terror seriously enough to have serious objections to measures that may be an unconstitutional infringement on the liberties of American Citizens.

If you think that Bush is strong on terror, answer us as to why he has not moved on a stronger immigration policy, border security, and dealt decisively with the Saudi Government who gave us bin Ladin and 20 individuals who planned and committed the 9/11 atrocities.

Your statements are laughable.