Eric Dondero.
If you choose to believe the word of a wacko who has offended anybody he's had any prolonged dealings with and was fired by Ron Paul for offenses that Paul could not tolerate from staff, be my guest, you're beyond help.
That doesn’t sound like a person who takes the war on terror seriously. It DOES sound like a person who will sit on his hands like bill clintonm, look the other way when we are attacked again and again by islamofacists, and pass off another 9/11 to be dealt with by someone who is actually strong on terror, like Dubya.
Paul takes the supposed war on terror seriously enough to have serious objections to measures that may be an unconstitutional infringement on the liberties of American Citizens.
If you think that Bush is strong on terror, answer us as to why he has not moved on a stronger immigration policy, border security, and dealt decisively with the Saudi Government who gave us bin Ladin and 20 individuals who planned and committed the 9/11 atrocities.
Your statements are laughable.
What makes him a wacko? The fact that he worked for Ron Paul for so long? If that’s the case then I agree, but that doesn’t mean he’s wrong when he relates what happened when the vote for force in afghanistan was up. Given Paul’s softness on the WOT, it shouldn’t surprise anyone.
Atleast he was sane enough to stop working for a anti-war conspiracy theorist, I’ll give him that.
“Paul takes the supposed war on terror seriously enough to have serious objections to measures that may be an unconstitutional infringement on the liberties of American Citizens.”
O that is such BS. Him being more worried about a terrorist in guantanamo not being comfy enough or a cell member not having his phone call listened to while he’s calling his buddies in pakistan than the potential for millions of american deaths means he’s serious about the war on terror? I’m not buying it, and no one else here does either.
And a lot of people fault bush for not taking care of illegal immigration and the border. Mostly it’s because the GOP doesn’t want to scare away hispanic voters (my guess). But not one of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 was here illegally. They all had visas. None of them even crossed the mexican border. Most of them were also saudi arabian, but that in itself doesn’t give us leverage to attack Saudi Arabia.
And bringing up Saudi Arabia as if to say Ron Paul WOULD “deal decisively with them” is silly. Ron Paul supports an isolationist foreign policy.
