Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarian Party: Campaign Finance Reform Ruling is Assault on Free Speech
Libertarian Party press release ^ | December 11, 2003 | George Getz

Posted on 12/11/2003 6:38:18 PM PST by Commie Basher

====================================
NEWS FROM THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY
2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 100
Washington DC 20037
World Wide Web: http://www.LP.org
====================================
For release: December 11, 2003
====================================
For additional information:
George Getz, Communications Director
Phone: (202) 333-0008
====================================

High court's ruling is all-out assault on right to engage in politics, Libertarians say

WASHINGTON, DC -- The Libertarian Party, which is one of the plaintiffs that challenged the campaign finance law upheld on Tuesday by the Supreme Court, has denounced the ruling as an "all-out assault on the right of every American to engage in the political process."

"Why not just outlaw elections and get it over with?" said Geoffrey Neale, the Libertarian Party's national chair. "The Supreme Court has just given incumbent politicians the power to financially cripple their competitors and, in the process, award themselves lifetime jobs."

In a 5-4 ruling that shocked advocacy groups across the political spectrum, the Supreme Court endorsed key provisions of the McCain- Feingold campaign finance law. Specifically, the court upheld a ban on "soft money" contributions from wealthy individuals, corporations and labor unions, as well the law's prohibition on running certain political advertisements within close proximity to an election.

But Libertarians point out that McCain-Feingold was nothing more than an incumbent protection act in the first place -- and that the court's ruling was tantamount to outlawing political competition.

"Running for office and communicating a message aren't free," Neale said. "So making it illegal to raise money to buy political ads, and banning the ads during the period when they're most effective, is tantamount to outlawing the message itself. That's a crime against the First Amendment as well as an affront to the democratic process."

Incumbent politicians already enjoy powerful advantages, Neale pointed out, such as name recognition and the ability to attract news media, taxpayer-financed staffs and office space, and the franking privilege.

The so-called campaign finance reform act was merely an attempt to eliminate the only weapon that many challengers have: contributions freely given by individuals or groups that share their views, he noted.

Acknowledging that the stated goal of the legislation was to clean up politics, Neale said: "Justice Sandra Day O'Connor pointed out that 'corruption, and in particular the appearance of corruption,' is rampant in Washington -- and of course, she's right.

"But a free-flowing, robust political debate isn't the problem; it's the solution. The only way to dislodge an entrenched, corrupt politician is to allow competing candidates, and anyone else who so chooses, to publicly criticize them and offer voters a better alternative.

"By upholding McCain-Feingold, the Supreme Court has merely guaranteed that corrupt politicians will stay in office for a longer period of time."

In March 1992, the Libertarian Party signed on as a co-plaintiff in McConnell v FEC, the lawsuit spearheaded by Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell that sought to overturn the campaign finance reform law.

The party argued that the law would have a devastating impact on its activities by eliminating certain sources of revenue and imposing significant regulatory and administrative burdens.

For example, the law prohibits the organization from accepting donations of more than $25,000 from any individual; prevents it from taking money from organizations that are not "recognized political committees," so it cannot sell ads in its party newspaper to nonprofit corporations or incorporated businesses; and cannot accept funds for memberships or literature from its own state affiliates, unless they also comply with the law's onerous regulations.

However, the party was vindicated by one aspect of Tuesday's ruling, Neale added, when the court struck down the provision of the law banning minors from making contributions to political parties.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Without vast public heat, all it is likely to see in this is, "Incumbent Protection Act."

And, conveniently, the CFR just cut the wattage....

141 posted on 12/12/2003 11:54:08 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1038802/posts

I think this is the article I was reading. I was babysitting, and left the window open so I could finish reading it later. Unfortunately, I found a very precious 5 year old taking great delight in closing my windows. It seems she wanted to play a game on my computer, and didn't realize she could play without closing my windows. She has a lot to learn.

I still love her, anyway. ;o)
142 posted on 12/12/2003 12:23:39 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Then you don't see the logic. Either the SCOTUS overrules the law, in which case you've achieved total political victory by removing the issue from your opponents without giving anything up, or else the SCOTUS rules that the law *is* Constitutional, in which case you haven't signed anything unConstitutional, per SCOTUS.

I see. So, since Roe v. Wade was been decided for the side of the baby-killers, then we're all in agreement that abortion IS Constitutional.

Do you agree with the SCOTUS interpretation of the First Amendment as it applies in this case?

143 posted on 12/12/2003 2:11:23 PM PST by John R. (Bob) Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We lose the presidency, we lose the majority and we'll lose big time to a liberal activist judiciary for the next 40 years

Why would we lose the majority if we lose Bush?

144 posted on 12/12/2003 3:02:20 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
Along with the press, Daschle and McCain, President Bush was enduring full court pressure

So President Bush signed it because he was under pressure?

145 posted on 12/12/2003 3:05:25 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
And there may be a huge senate fight, but I believe we will get Bush's conservative nominees confirmed.

You think President Bush will fight for them his next term?

I hope he will.

146 posted on 12/12/2003 3:19:50 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
And there may be a huge senate fight, but I believe we will get Bush's conservative nominees confirmed.

You think President Bush will fight for them his next term?

I hope he will.

147 posted on 12/12/2003 3:20:51 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Please list for me the number of times in our history when we've had a Republican President, a Republican Senate, a Republican House and a Supreme Court that is half full of aging long in the tooth liberals who are sure to retire in the very near future?

Never have we had all that.
What good has it done us?

We get increased social spending that the Democrats could never get away with.

148 posted on 12/12/2003 3:29:06 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
How many Amendments are left?

Hmmmm...Not many but give it another year or a second term. :)

149 posted on 12/12/2003 3:34:35 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thank God that Gore did not get in

He didn't? Oh, I didn't notice.

150 posted on 12/12/2003 3:38:08 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The first amendment will be fine. This was a temporary blow by an insane court and it will be reversed.

I look at it as a temporary blow by an insane President that everone keeps insisting is conservative.

151 posted on 12/12/2003 3:42:06 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
Yesterday, amnesty for illegals, social security for illegals back in Mexico... Enough is enough.

Yes, it is. And now he slaps Taiwan in the face after he gets kissy face with China.

152 posted on 12/12/2003 3:49:42 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We don't need more of the same.

We seem to have more of the same.

153 posted on 12/12/2003 3:54:37 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Your motives are admirable, but your logic betrays you.!!

Please do not take my words out of context to suit your argument. It is unbecoming.

154 posted on 12/12/2003 4:10:18 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I think that it's safe to say that our President's eyes have been opened to just how activist/liberal/and flaky our current SCOTUS has become.

So President Bush wanted the Supreme Court to clean up the crap he signed?

I would love a President that does not blame everone else for what he "has" to do.

155 posted on 12/12/2003 4:21:16 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Thank God that Gore did not get in
"He didn't? Oh, I didn't notice."

Do you think that Gore would have killed the Kyoto Global Warming treaty that he signed in Japan, or that Gore would have banned Partial Birth Abortion?

Presidency of George W. Bush -- the first 34 months

 

Banned Partial Birth Abortion

Reversed Clinton's move to strike Reagan's anti-abortion Mexico Policy

Killed the Kyoto Global Warming Treaty

Killed U.S. involvement in the International Criminal Court

Killed Clinton's CO2 rules that were choking off all of the electricity surplus to California.

Killed Clinton's "ergonomic" rules that OSHA was about to implement; rules that would have shut down every home business in America.

Killed the U.S. - CCCP ABM Treaty that was preventing the U.S. from deploying our ABM defenses


Has CONSTRUCTION in process on the first ten ABM silos in Alaska so that America has a defense against North Korean nukes

 

Pushed through THREE raises for our military.

Increased Defense Dept funding which had deteriorated during the previous 8 years

 

Stopped foreign aid that would be used to fund abortions.

Supported and upheld the ban on abortions at military hospitals

Signed E.O. reversing Clinton's policy of not requiring parental consent for abortions under the Medical Privacy Act

Signed TWO bills into law that arm our pilots with handguns in the cockpit

Currently pushing for full immunity from lawsuits for our national gun manufacturers

Ordered Attorney-General Ashcroft to formally notify the Supreme Court that the OFFICIAL U.S. government position on the 2nd Amendment is that it supports INDIVIDUAL rights to own firearms, NOT a leftist-imagined *collective* right


Told the United Nations we weren't interested in their plans for gun control (i.e. the International Ban on Small Arms Trafficking Treaty)

Successfully executed 2 wars: Afghanistan and Iraq. 50 million people who had lived under tyrannical regimes now live in freedom

 

Executed a WAR ON TERROR by getting world-wide cooperation to track funds/terrorists (has cut off much of the terrorist's funding and captured or killed many key leaders of the al Qaeda network)

 

Brought back our EP-3 intel plane and crew from China without any bribes or bloodshed

Started withdrawing our troops from Bosnia and has announced withdrawal of our troops from Germany and the Korean DMZ.

Signed the LARGEST nuclear arms reduction in world history with Russia

Initiated comprehensive review of our military, which was completed just prior to 9/11/01, accurately reported that ASYMMETRICAL WARFARE was critical.

Changed the tone in the White House, restoring HONOR and DIGNITY to the Presidency

Reorganized bureaucracy...after 9/11, condensed 20+ overlapping agencies and their intelligence sectors into one agency: the Department of Homeland Security.

Initiated discussion on privatizing Social Security and individual investment accounts.

Improving govt. efficiency with .8 million jobs put up for bid...weakening unions and cutting undeserved pay raises. Wants merit based promotions/raises only.

Orchestrated Republican control of the White House, the House AND the Senate.

Killed the liberal ABA's role in vetting federal judges for Congress.

GWB signed an executive order enforcing the Supreme Court's Beck decision (re: union dues being used for political campaigns against individual's wishes)

Turned around an inherited economy that was in recession.

Passed tough new laws to hold corporate criminals to account as a result of corporate scandals.

Signed 2 income tax cuts ---- 1 of which was the largest Dollar value tax cut in world history


Reduced taxes on dividends and capital gains

In process of eliminating IRS marriage penalty.

Increased small business incentives to expand and to hire new people


Signed into law the No Child Left Behind legislation delivering the most dramatic education reforms in a generation (challenging the soft bigotry of low expectations)

Reorganized the INS in an attempt to safeguard the borders and ports of America and to eliminate bureaucratic redundancies and lack of accountability.

Signed trade promotion authority

Committed US funds to purchase medicine for millions of men and women and children now suffering with AIDS in Africa

Passed Medicare Reform (authorized $39.5 Billion per year for preventive medicine such as drugs and doctor visits as well as included a ten year Privatization option)

Urging federal liability reform to eliminate frivolous lawsuits

Supports class action reform bill which limits lawyer fees so that more settlement money goes to victims

Submitted comprehensive Energy Plan--awaits Congressional action (works to develop cleaner technology, produce more natural gas here at home, make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy, improve national grid, etc.)

Endorses and promotes The Responsibility Era ("In a compassionate society, people respect one another and take responsibility for the decisions they make in life. My hope is to change the culture from one that has said, if it feels good, do it; if you've got a problem, blame somebody else -- to one in which every single American understands that he or she are responsible for the decisions that you make; you're responsible for loving your children with all your heart and all your soul; you're responsible for being involved with the quality of the education of your children; you're responsible for making sure the community in which you live is safe; you're responsible for loving your neighbor, just like you would like to be loved yourself. " -----this quote was too good to leave out)

Started the USA Freedom Corps

Initiated review of all federal agencies with a goal to eliminate federal jobs (completed September 2003) in an effort to reduce the size of federal gov while increasing private sector jobs.

Part of coalition (Russia, Israel, EU, Palestine, USA) for Israeli/Palestinian "Roadmap to Peace"

Challenged the United Nations to live up to their responsibilities and not become The League of Nations ( in other words, completely irrelevant)

Nominated strong, conservative judges to the judiciary.

Changed parts of the Forestry Management Act to allow necessary clean-up of the national forests in order to reduce fire danger.

As part of the national forests clean-up, the President restricted judicial challenges (based on the Endangered Species Act and other challenges) and removed the need for an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) before removing fuels/logging to reduce fire danger.


Significantly eased field-testing controls of genetically engineered crops.

President Bush signed the workplace verification bill to prevent hiring of illegal Aliens
S. 1685, the Basic Pilot Extension Act of 2003, was signed by President Bush on December 3, 2003.
It extends for five years the workplace employment eligibility authorization pilot programs created in 1996. It expands the pilot programs from the original five states to all 50 states.


156 posted on 12/12/2003 4:24:50 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: John R. (Bob) Locke
So it's okay to sign an un-Constitutional piece of legislation into law if you're sure the SCOTUS will strike it down? That's a little unnerving to me.

Me too. What the heck happened?

We have the House, the Senate and the Presidency. So how did this ever get passed unless the President wanted it?

157 posted on 12/12/2003 4:25:02 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Southack
In light of the fact that you expected the SCOTUS to strike this law down, and they failed to do so, have you changed your position on the Prescription Drug Plan? That can only be considered a longer shot than CFR to succeed. Perhaps now you've seen the dangers of gambling?
158 posted on 12/12/2003 4:47:10 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
What does SCOTUS have to do with prescription drugs?
159 posted on 12/12/2003 4:54:31 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: The_Eaglet; onyx
Your CP will only serve to help elect democrats, which makes yall no better than democrats and there is nothing further to discuss.

True.

If we just don't vote, we are voting for Democrats.

I got it now. If I vote for anyone except President Bush, I am voting for Hillery.

If I don't vote at all, I am putting Hillery in the WhiteHouse.

160 posted on 12/12/2003 5:00:53 PM PST by carenot (Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson