Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ThomasMore
If you are talking about the deutercanonicals as apocrypha; sorry, I accept them as scripture, as did the church up until the reformation.

As you know they were not always accepted by the church as doctrinal , but as holy writings, even Jerome did not want them in the canon. But that is another discussion

80 posted on 07/01/2003 1:07:19 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: RnMomof7
As you know they were not always accepted by the church as doctrinal , but as holy writings, even Jerome did not want them in the canon.

Jerome's opinion aside, he obeyed those in the Church with the authority to make such decisions.

But that is another discussion

It sure is.

SD

86 posted on 07/01/2003 1:12:31 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: RnMomof7
You're right on that. The deuteros were disputed for centuries until 393, 397, and 419. And yes, it is another discussion.

But regardless of why we accept the NT as ENTIRELY inerrant, at least we do (you and I). :^)

How ya been mom? I've been too busy to post as much as I'd like.

God Bless,
TM
91 posted on 07/01/2003 1:20:15 PM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson