Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: A_Thinker
In other words, I can choose Anarchy or Authority? In the Anarchy of Protestantism, it is impossible to tell anyone they are wrong. After all, its just their interpretation of Scripture. It sure can't be any better or worse than yours.

How can Protestants correct errors without some reference to objective truths? They cannot possibly know they are not simply accepting new errors. Don't appeal to the Bible on me now. There are a zillion different interpretations by Protestants, and you've already granted that every believer may simply look at the Bible and come away from it with whatever he will.

Where is the Holy Ghost confirming the Church in all truth (John 14) in this scheme you propose?

54 posted on 06/25/2003 11:29:35 AM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Hermann the Cherusker
The scriptures are the objective final authority for Protestants.

Truth proclaimed orally has no edge over truth proclaimed in writing. Both are subject to mis-interpetation.

However, truth proclaimed in writing is, at least, verifiable, from one point in time to another.

Even if I am not sure that I am interpreting a written teaching correctly (and the Holy Spirit will act at this point to teach truth to the receptive heart), ... at least I know that the actual teachings themselves have not changed.

True, I can ascertain the consistency of tradition as well, but to do so ... I still have no choice but to look to the writtn record of such (bringing in yet more risk of incorrect interpretation).

So, ... if I am going to do this (place my faith in the written record) anyway, I may as well go all the way back to the recorded words of God, Himself.

62 posted on 06/25/2003 11:43:44 AM PDT by A_Thinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Please allow me to add to this posting ...

The scriptures are the objective final authority for Protestants.

Truth proclaimed orally has no edge over truth proclaimed in writing. Both are subject to mis-interpetation.

However, truth proclaimed in writing is, at least, verifiable, from one point in time to another.

Even if I am not sure that I am interpreting a written teaching correctly (and the Holy Spirit will act at this point to teach truth to the receptive heart), ... at least I know that the actual teachings themselves have not changed.

True, I can ascertain the consistency of tradition as well, but to do so ... I still have no choice but to look to the writtn record of such (bringing in yet more risk of incorrect interpretation).

So, ... if I am going to do this (place my faith in the written record) anyway, I may as well go all the way back to the recorded words of God, Himself, which He, Himself, will help me to interpret.

63 posted on 06/25/2003 11:47:21 AM PDT by A_Thinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson