[lilylangtree]

Listened to Chuck Missler via radio this a.m. when he started a new topic of refuting scientific studies that indicate there is no God by using scientific studies to indicate there is a God. Pretty persuasive information.

[Dimensio]

Listened to Chuck Missler via radio this a.m. when he started a new topic of refuting scientific studies that indicate there is no God by using scientific studies to indicate there is a God.

Your statement implies that there are two idiotic lines of thought (I'm not accusing you of engaging in either of them, mind you). The first is the notion that science can provide evidence that there are no gods. The second is that science can provide evidence that there is at least one god.

The correct means for 'refuting' any allegedly scientific study that claims to show that there are no gods is to point out that the study of gods is entirely outside of the realm of science, and as such nothing in science can address the subject.