HERE: http://www.ad2004.com/Biblecodes/articles/matrixmethod.pdf
At Moshe Aharon Shak's site.
HERE: http://www.ad2004.com/Biblecodes/articles/matrixmethod.pdf
From the article you cite:
A Scientific Proof for the Validity of the Bible Codes NEW 2/12/2003Quix, that paper is about methodology. It does not contain, nor does it claim to be a biblically testable predictive proof. Further, it describes a different election outcome than was "predicted" previously in the paper it references:
Moshe Aharon Shak has put together a 6-page paper outlining the methodology he used to create the Washington Sniper matrix and Israeli Elections matrix.
The paper which that paper references which was published before the elections concludes:
Today (Jan 10, 2003), three weeks before the election, the matrix is very accurate on many issues about this coming election. However, Israeli politics can be extremely unpredictable and volatile. Moshe Katzav was elected as President in 2000. Untiul the night before peopel went to vote, everyone was sure that Peres would win! There were surprises in other general elections in th epast due to unforeseen developments. Even if this matrix fails to paint the right picture of the final election results for January 2003, it already paints an excellent picture of what the January 2003 elections are like [ but no better than a Jan 10, 2003 newspaper].Quix you have yet to provide the proof Bible Codes predicted the Columbia disaster before hand, and you are now just posting a meaningless series of Bible Code workups which I doubt you've read let alone thought about, none of which are a biblically testable predictive prophecy for which you yourself claimed we should be testing.
Some day the Lord Jesus is going to directly ask you "Quix? Why did you persist in posting falsehoods about what is in my Word and the Holy Spirit's sovereign choice over whom shall receive the gift of Prophecy?
What are you going to tell Him, Quix?