Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts; sinkspur; Siobhan
Well, I did a little googling, and voila: the author of the article is, in fact, chairman of the Texas chapter of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists.

Whatever mistakes Fr. Groeschel made in the specific cases cited, he is absolutely right when he says that the chief problem is "active homosexuality with minors."

Bravo, well done B Knotts!

This is the bottom line, Sink.

If you had a shred of decency, you'd ask the mods to pull this homo anti-Catholic hit piece.

41 posted on 03/02/2003 2:59:14 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Polycarp
This is the bottom line, Sink.

What's the bottom line? That the abusers are homosexual men preying on adolescents?

If that's the case, then why did Groeschel recommend that they be returned to the ministry, some in ministry involving young men? Did Groeschel not recognize that these men were active homosexuals? If he didn't, what kind of psychologist is he?

If you had a shred of decency, you'd ask the mods to pull this homo anti-Catholic hit piece.

I have decency. That's why I want all the pus to be drained from this boil. Groeschel is a psychologist who was complicit in returning men to the priesthood who didn't belong there. He also made this recommendation to clueless prelates like Bernard Law, and, as a result, Law is doing penance today because he listened to "experts" like Groeschel.

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, Dr. Surely, in your line of work, you know that.

45 posted on 03/02/2003 3:07:22 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson