The 'outcry' would be meaningless if, one, it were man who freely sinned, and not God who decreed that very sin (for His glory) (see Calvin on Adam's fall)
Two, that the greater Adam had not appeared and taken care of the Original sin issue (Rom.5:18)
Third, to save some when all could be saved (none being worthy) is unjust.
Rhetorical appeals are nothing but smokescreens to hide the realization that Calvinism makes a mockery of God's love for all men (the Love that Calvin stated God had in 2Pet.3).
Unable to grasp why God would allow those whom He died for to perish, the Calvinists simply retreat to a mystical Sovereignity, that in kind is no different then that of Islam.
You have demonstrated clearly and concisely that not only do you not understand Calvinism, but you have no idea at all what Grace and Mercy really is. It's right out here for all to see now, Ed. Your 'grace' isn't really grace at all. It's moral obligation.
Rhetorical appeals are nothing but smokescreens to hide the realization that Calvinism makes a mockery of God's love for all men (the Love that Calvin stated God had in 2Pet.3).
Yes. God speaks nowhere in Scripture of hating men, or His wrath towards men, or His disdain for men. You say I make a mockery of God's love? You sir make a mockery of His justice and righteousness.
Unable to grasp why God would allow those whom He died for to perish, the Calvinists simply retreat to a mystical Sovereignity, that in kind is no different then that of Islam.
We have no problem grasping it. We embrace it. You on the otherhand flatly deny any truth of God's sovereignty over His creation. You pretty your position up by permitting some vague notion of God's control over the events of the universe, but YOU run to secret, irrational, autonomous will in MAN that God has no hope of understanding, influencing or reasoning with. And you ice it with the notion that grace is really an obligatory action on God's part.