[Campion]

Now I have no way of knowing the former Pope's purpose in moving it there... Maybe he did it for historical reasons.

I already explained what those reasons were.

And, therefore, that your fictitious hyberbole to defend the Catholic Church is not a really valid defense of the implication.

I used no "fictitious hyperbole" in defense of an "implication". I merely stated the facts that demonstrate your ignorance and bigotry.

[OHelix]

Minutes later, across the Reuters wire:

VATICAN ENDORSES PEPSI: "COCA-COLA DRINKERS ARE SINNERS" - SAYS UNNAMED SOURCE CLOSE TO SITUATION

Unless this actually happened, this is fictitious hyperbole. I'm not saying fictitious hyperbole is good or bad, but THIS IS FICTITIOUS HYPERBOLE.

I merely stated the facts that demonstrate your ignorance and bigotry.

Exactly what fact did you state to demonstrate my ignorance and bigotry? (I'll grant you the bit about the lay brother as demonstrating my ignorance.)