Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Jean Chauvin
(For the sake of argument let's posit that the blind, deaf man does not want to die)

I could have grabbed the man and irresistably drawn him away from death and towards life.

So I bear NO responsibility for doing everything except grab the guy?
17 posted on 01/31/2003 10:54:57 AM PST by ksen (HHD - The strength of the Ring Barrel is fading)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: ksen; RnMomof7
Better yet, let's assume that you stop the man just before he steps off the cliff. You then have the power to remove his blindness.

It is not unreasonable for him to be startled and upset that he is being disturbed from what he thinks is a peaceful walk.

Once he notices he was about to walk off the cliff and assuming he does not want to die, can you imagine that he wouldn't fall down on his knees and turn towards his "savior"?

Back to your question:

Let's assume that God ordained that we "irresistably draw men away from cliffs" (preaching the gospel) as a way of saving that man.

The man is still responsible for walking off the cliff, however, would you want to face God with the knowledge that you failed to utilize his ordained method of saving people from walking off cliffs?

Jean

19 posted on 01/31/2003 11:09:13 AM PST by Jean Chauvin (I'm outta here for a while!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson