Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Natural Law is Making a Comeback
The Weekly Standard ^ | 12-20-99 | J. Budziszewski

Posted on 01/10/2003 7:41:35 AM PST by Maximilian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Maximilian
Exactly.
21 posted on 01/10/2003 11:57:38 AM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Nice analysis of the root of absurdity.
22 posted on 01/10/2003 12:02:03 PM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Interesting analysis on ID and Natural Law. If you have time, here is a talk that William Dembski gave on the future prospects of ID, including research fields (most intriguing: DNA steganography). The link is to a web page, the full paper is in PDF.
23 posted on 01/10/2003 12:12:24 PM PST by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Thanks...useful, clarifying summary.
24 posted on 01/10/2003 12:13:25 PM PST by HumanaeVitae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Thanks for a great post!!it has captured in one article al-st everything about natural law that the many books I have read and lectures I have attended,enabled me to put in my "world view".And,it has done it clearly and concisely.

In fact I spent years accumulating the info and then spent the last several years trying to figure out how to introduce it into pertinent conversations without putting the other party into a state of utter confusion or a coma.

thaanks again and your right about the author,a genius!!

25 posted on 01/10/2003 1:02:54 PM PST by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Po-Mo-Tho bump
26 posted on 01/10/2003 8:49:48 PM PST by Dajjal (really, that should be Po-Po-No-Tho, since we're now in "After")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Thanks for posting this. Just to tie it in with the other threads, the claim that the natural law is changeable has been a common assertion of the new theology. Charles Curran made this claim, teaching that the natural law and moral rules were in continual evolution. Cardinal Suenens made a similar point when he stated that "a healthy evolution" had removed certain taboos in the relations between men and women. Some of this thinking has permeated the seminaries for a long time now, which explains in part some of the moral rot. In other theological circles the ontological basis for the Natural Law itself has been fiercely attacked.
27 posted on 01/11/2003 6:57:49 AM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Thank you. An important post. While the most general contours of natural law may be "self evident," the particulars aren't all that clear, hence the centuries of disucussion of this important concept. Glad to hear it's back on the front burner of at least some moral philosophers. Generally speaking, though, natural law has few champions amidst the prevailing orthodoxies of postmodernism. Too bad.
28 posted on 01/11/2003 1:15:48 PM PST by Hibernius Druid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
What a pleasure to come across this thread. Thanks for the flag.
29 posted on 01/13/2003 11:40:27 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThanksBTTT
.
30 posted on 01/13/2003 11:43:05 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson