[lockeliberty]

Inconsequential gibberishness. The date was the issue, not the FACT of Easter. sheesh...Ya call that an arguement?

Is this an example of ~your~ cold, hard logic?

LOL

[Catholicguy]

<> absolutely....Webster adduces the issue over the date on which to celebrate Easter as evidence for his arguement re Traditon. It is preposterous...and, if he knew the entire story, it would argue AGAINST his antipathy towards the Papacy and its authority

Some day, on another topic, I will show how the Holy Spirit led him to make this mistake in selecting this on which to build his case:) The facts about the issue PROVE Papal Primacy. But, that is for another day, another time<>