Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Desdemona
I'm going to spoil his fun, but it is getting old. From all of you.

It would have been nice if we could have discussed this very important article. But the entire discussion was one side screaming "schism" and the other side (consisting of poor Ultima Ratio alone) attempting to defend itself. You have been more or less civilized and I appreciate that. At least you appear willing to listen to the other side. That is really all that is needed.

279 posted on 12/02/2002 12:44:59 PM PST by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: Zviadist
It would have been nice if we could have discussed this very important article.

Yes, it would have been, because when it comes to the language of the NO, all sides agree it's bad.

At least you appear willing to listen to the other side.

I'm not going to scream SCHISM! That's not my style. You guys have some things to say which do coincide with the more conservative of the Catholics who do not follow SSPX leaders. Arguing with Rome that SSPX is or isn't in schism is useless, IMO. So, bypass that and at least discuss what we can at least agree on.

I have to go shortly, so I'm outta here at least until this evening.
282 posted on 12/02/2002 12:53:25 PM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson