Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: patent
A phony response. You ignore the complex argument of supplied jurisdiction--just as you ignore my challenge to show where I've been heretical. You feel free to tell others I am a heretic, but yet you cannot cite a single heretical view. What is this but an obvious slander?
261 posted on 12/02/2002 11:35:10 AM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: ultima ratio
A phony response. You ignore the complex argument of supplied jurisdiction--just as you ignore my challenge to show where I've been heretical. You feel free to tell others I am a heretic, but yet you cannot cite a single heretical view. What is this but an obvious slander?
I have cited plenty elsewhere. I do not wish to here because I would not want to misquote you, and as a result I would have to take the time to find a quote. The one I have in mind now, as best I recall it, is your claim that you can argue that the Pope’s decree excommunicating Lefebvre is invalid and can be judged. That is heresy, he is the highest authority and his decrees cannot be judged, per Vatican I. You, on the other hand, call me a heretic for actions on this very thread and have refused to back it up.

patent  +AMDG

263 posted on 12/02/2002 11:38:59 AM PST by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson