Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
That should be "Propter hoc, ergo propter hoc."
15 posted on 10/16/2002 2:32:20 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
Nope.

It should be "POST hoc, ergo propter hoc."

BTW, I agree with you that a "vote" would preserve the NO Mass in the USA. But I am also convinced that the TOTAL lack of education regarding the Mass, its history, and the art-forms integral to proper celebration has a great deal to do with our shared projection of the 'vote.'

At the very least, such education would likely persuade many that their "Mass" is not exactly what it should be.
24 posted on 10/16/2002 3:07:37 PM PDT by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
"Post hoc, ergo propter hoc."
63 posted on 10/17/2002 3:06:01 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson