[RnMomof7]

The problem is Scott has forgotten more than I will ever know..so the lie had to be intentional.,..I have read this is one of his own personal little doctrines and one that led to some mumblings among the scripitual knowledgable Presbyterians he was pastoring...perhaps he has simply found a home for his pet doctrine among the Biblically illiterate  

Here is the link...now think about this ..The JW's only changed ONE word in the Bible and that one word strips Jesus of His divinity..words do mean things

[Catholicguy]

The problem is Scott has forgotten more than I will ever know

<> FINALLY, a statement of yours I can agree with.<>

..so the lie had to be intentional.,

<> Is there such a thing as an unintentional lie?<>

..I have read this is one of his own personal little doctrines and one that led to some mumblings among the scripitual knowledgable Presbyterians he was pastoring.<>

That was from a speech given to Catholics. Other scholars have noted this before. Hahn is just explaining what his scholarship revealed to him<>

..perhaps he has simply found a home for his pet doctrine among the Biblically illiterate

<> Calvin would be proud of you<>

Here is the link...now think about this ..The JW's only changed ONE word in the Bible and that one word strips Jesus of His divinity..words do mean things

<> Yes, they do. Hahn was likely recalling that from memory. It was the text of a speech not a Doctrinal Thesis.

Your quibble is immaterial and your disgusting judgemenatlism is quintessential Calvinism.<>