Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Current status of Mary [Re: Cardinal Ratzinger Does Not Foresee Approval of “Co-redemptrix”]

Posted on 10/07/2002 1:03:41 PM PDT by Polycarp

This is a decent summary from a non-Catholic source:

Current status of Mary:

Although the virgin Mary is rarely mentioned in the Bible, and although Protestant churches consider her to be a relatively minor biblical character, the Roman Catholic Church has long assigned her an elevated status. 

The Roman Catholic Church has historically taught two basic dogmas about Mary:

bullet 1. Mary is the Mother of God.
bullet 2. Perpetual Virginity: Mary was a virgin when Yeshua (Jesus) was conceived; this state continued throughout her life.

Two additional dogmas about Mary were infallibly proclaimed by two popes during the 19th and 20th centuries:

bullet 3. Immaculate Conception: Pope Pius IX proclaimed the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Mary on 1854-DEC-8. Many Roman Catholics believe that this refers to Jesus' conception circa 5 to 7 BCE. In fact, it means that Mary herself was conceived free of sin before her birth circa 20 BCE.
bullet 4. Assumption of Mary: Pope Pius XII, in his Munificentissimus Deus (1950-NOV-1), defined that Mary, "after the completion of her earthly life was assumed body and soul into the glory of Heaven." That is, she was "taken up body and soul into heaven," at the time of her death. She is there "exalted as Queen of the Universe." 1

In addition, various popes and church councils have referred to Mary as co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate:

bullet In ancient times:
bullet St. Antonius (circa 250 - 350): "All graces that have ever been bestowed on men, all came through Mary."
bullet St. Bernard (1090 - 1153): "[Mary is called] the gate of heaven, because no one can enter that blessed kingdom without passing through her."
bullet St. Bonaventure (1221 - 1274): "As the moon, which stands between the sun and the earth, transmits to this latter whatever it receives from the former, so does Mary pour out upon us who are in this world the heavenly graces that she receives from the divine sun of justice." 1
bullet 1750: Alphonsus Mary de Liguori, canonized as Saint Alphonsus in 1839, wrote a book "The Glories of Mary." It continues to be published today, under various church imprimaturs. Various chapters in the book are titled: "Mary our Help," "Mary our Mediatress," "Mary our Advocate," etc. 1
bullet 1935: Pope Pius XI gave the title co-redemptrix to Mary during a radio broadcast. 1
bullet Circa 1965: The Chapter 8 of the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church, passed by the Vatican Council II states, in part: 
bullet "Rightly, therefore, the Fathers see Mary not merely as passively engaged by God, but as freely cooperating in the work of man’s salvation through faith and obedience. For as St. Irenaeus says, she being obedient, became the cause of salvation for herself and for the whole human race. Hence not a few of the early Fathers gladly assert with him in their preaching ...'death through Eve, life through Mary.' This union of the mother with the son in the work of salvation is made manifest from the time of Christ’s virginal conception up to his death" 2  
bullet "Taken up to heaven she did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation. By her maternal charity, she cares for the brethren of her Son, who still journey on earth surrounded by dangers and difficulties, until they are led into their blessed home. Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the church under the titles of Advocate, Helper, Benefactress and Mediatrix." 3
bullet 1985: Pope John Paul II recognized Mary as co-redemptrix" during a speech in Guayaquil, Ecuador. He said, in part, "Having suffered for the Church, Mary deserved to become the Mother of all the disciples of her Son, the Mother of their unity...In fact Mary’s role as Co-redemptrix did not cease with the glorification of her Son." 4
bullet 1987-MAR-25: In his encyclical Redemptoris Mater, Pope John Paul II "referred to Mary as 'Mediatrix' three times, and as 'Advocate' twice." 1
bullet 1997-APR-9: During an audience Pope John-Paul II referred to the role of Mary during the crucifixion of Jesus: "Mary … co-operated during the event itself and in the role of mother; thus her co-operation embraces the whole of Christ’s saving work. She alone was associated in this way with the redemptive sacrifice that merited the salvation of all mankind. In union with Christ and in submission to him, she collaborated in obtaining the grace of salvation for all humanity...In God’s plan, Mary is the ‘woman’ (cf. John 2:4; John 19:26), the New Eve, united to the New Adam in restoring humanity to its original dignity. Her cooperation with her Son continues for all time in the universal motherhood which she enjoys in the order of grace. Trusting in this maternal cooperation, let us turn to Mary, imploring her help in all our needs." 1

Although Mary has been referred to on numerous occasions as co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate, none have the force of an infallible papal declaration.

Petition drive to promote an infallible statement:

Professor Mark Miravalle of Franciscan University in Steubenville, OH, initiated a formal petition drive in 1993 during a Marian conference at that university. It asks the Pope to make infallible statement that would officially elevate Mary, the mother of Jesus, to the status of co-redeemer. More than six million signatures from 148 countries have reached the Vatican as of the end of the year 2000, asking that Pope John Paul II infallibly declare a new dogma: "That the Virgin Mary is a co-redeemer with Jesus and co-operates fully with her son in the redemption of humanity." If this were done, "she would be a vastly more powerful figure, something close to the fourth member of the Holy Trinity and the primary female face through which Christians experience the divine." 3 Miravalle's petition has received support from Mother Theresa, 550 bishops, Cardinal John O'Connor and 41 other cardinals (including at least 12 cardinals in Rome). If the dogma is declared infallibly, it would pronounce Mary as "Co-Redemptrix [co-redeemer], Mediatrix [mediator] of All Graces, and Advocate for the People of God." It would require all Roman Catholics to believe that:

bullet Mary is co-redemptrix with Jesus. She participates in people's redemption.
bullet Mary is mediatrix and has the power to grant all graces.
bullet Mary is the advocate for the people of God and has the authority to influence God's judgments.

If the dogma is infallibly declared, many feel that, in the words of Father Rene Laurentin, it would be the equivalent of launching "bombs" at Protestants. Father Laurentin is a French monk and the world's leading Mary scholar. He believes that: "Mary is the model of our faith but she is not divine. There is no mediation or co-redemption except in Christ. He alone is God." Raising the status of Mary would further acerbate the split between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches. Ecumenical activity would be negatively affected. There is speculation that a schism might develop over the issue within the Roman Catholic church. There may be a renewed debate over the role of the pope's power in the church. 5,6


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist; ratzinger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 761-777 next last
To: Desdemona
I don't have a lot of time to reply here, so I'll say as much as I can and follow up tomorrow.

Atoning is not Christ's sacrifice to make. That is ours. Christ's sacrifice was the ultimate one, one which none of us can ever repay - he gave his life for us. The least we can do is his will.

We know who, but what did He give His life for? Why was it necessary to die? If I throw myself in front of a car on the freeway and leave a note for my wife saying I did it for her, that's not sacrifice. That's suicide. It is devoid of any noble reason. So clearly there must have been a PURPOSE for Christ to have died. If He did not die for a purpose equitable to us, we are not in any way indebted to Him. The sacrifice was to atone for the sins of the world. "Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world." How are we tied to that sacrifice? By faith. Obedience is born of that faith, not vice versa. Pharisees were all about obeying the Law, but without the faith they were an offense.

To be continued later...

481 posted on 10/09/2002 1:45:51 PM PDT by Frumanchu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
What did Jesus say about the traditions of men?

Protestants find clearly stated in scripture that we are saved by the Blood of Jesus Christ...no add ons.....not communion..not baptism....not the pope...not by good works and no purgatory ......In other words the word of God is VERY clear on the means of Salvation...for everyone but Catholics

Now you are welcome to work your way to heaven if you choose..but you will never be good enough

482 posted on 10/09/2002 1:47:05 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona; Catholicguy
So do all Catholics agree ? On everything?
483 posted on 10/09/2002 1:48:14 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; Catholicguy
Do we all agree? No. CG and I go round in circles a lot.
484 posted on 10/09/2002 1:49:55 PM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

Comment #485 Removed by Moderator

To: RnMomof7
Now you are welcome to work your way to heaven if you choose..but you will never be good enough

You are correct. None of us are good enough.

Protestants find clearly stated in scripture that we are saved by the Blood of Jesus Christ...no add ons

Read it again. You missed a few things.
486 posted on 10/09/2002 1:52:31 PM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
<> But, if you are willing to believe those lies, you get to have birth control, divorce and remarriage, and you get a million and more Popes and you can choose for yourselves what Doctrines to believe and which ones to reject and you can find a church that suits YOU personally.

More abortions are preformed on Catholics than Protestants last stats I saw.....Catholics play word games and drop coins in the popes coffer to get an "annulment"...Birthcontrol? So how many kids you got CG? The average RC family in our area is 2 or 3...and that aint no accident...

<>< It is all about being double minded:>)

487 posted on 10/09/2002 1:53:06 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Which is why I prefer to call the protestant uprising a "revolt". Nothing was changed, but a lot was thrown out and destroyed.

Naw God just put the keys in the reformers pockets:>)

488 posted on 10/09/2002 1:54:10 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
You not only think that Calvin is God. You think you are.<>

Naw I am not the ark of the covenant...nor am I co redeemer...

No godess am I

489 posted on 10/09/2002 1:56:15 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
IMHO it is the shortcoming of the individual, and not of the church, that leaves most lacking in Bible knowledge. It is each one's responsiblity to immerse oneself in learning his faith, whatever denomination it is.

Agree 100%:)

Becky

490 posted on 10/09/2002 1:57:08 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
<> YES, go back and read it. It WAS a speech delivered to Catholics.

.I do not doubt it was a speech delievered to Catholics. His Reformed Presbyterians caught the "error" and would not agree to his teachings

What I said was he attempted to "teach" that stuff to a Presbyterian church that saw it for what it was...

491 posted on 10/09/2002 2:00:08 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
I am assuming you are Catholic. Would you mind reading my Post #461 and answering the question. I am not trying to stir anything up, just interested to know. Thanks.

Becky

492 posted on 10/09/2002 2:00:51 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
Why do you think Protestants take a Bible to church? They take it so they can follow word for word what is being read and taught...it is much harder to teach false doctrine if the folks are reading along
493 posted on 10/09/2002 2:02:04 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
The woman represents both Israel/the Church and Mary.

Consider the woman crowned with twelve stars. There is a difficulty with assuming that the woman directly represents the Church: the crown of stars (the twelve tribes or Apostles) is outside of the woman (who represents the Church) and separate from the woman. Catholics consider Mary the saint par excellence ("humanity's solitary boast") so taken together, the image of the woman (Mary, Mother of God) and the crown of twelve stars (the twelve Apostles) better represents the Church than the woman considered separately. As the Catholic Encyclopedia says, "Mary is both a figure of the Church, and its most prominent member."

At least part of the verses refer to the mother whose son is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron; according to Psalm 2:9, this is the Son of God, Jesus Christ, Whose mother is Mary.

* It was Mary's son that "was taken up to God, and to his throne" at the time of His Ascension into heaven.

* The dragon, or the devil of the earthly paradise (cf. Apocalypse 12:9; 20:2), endeavoured to devour Mary's Son from the first moments of His birth, by stirring up the jealousy of Herod and, later on, the enmities of the Jews.

* Owing to her unspeakable privileges, Mary may well be described as "clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars".

* It is true that commentators generally understand the whole passage as applying literally to the Church, and that part of the verses is better suited to the Church than to Mary. But it must be kept in mind that Mary is both a figure of the Church, and its most prominent member. What is said of the Church, is in its own way true of Mary. Hence the passage of the Apocalypse (12:5-6) does not refer to Mary merely by way of accommodation [108], but applies to her in a truly literal sense which appears to be partly limited to her, and partly extended to the whole Church. Mary's relation to the Church is well summed up in the expression "collum corporis mystici" applied to Our Lady by St. Bernardin of Siena. [109]

So then is the ark Israel...the Church and Mary?

In a sense Israel was the Ark of the Ark of the Covenant since the Ark was entrusted to Israel's care. Can the Church be the Ark of the New Covenant? In the sense that Mary (the Ark of the New Covenant) was entrusted to the care of the Church (Jesus entrusts Mary to John at Calvary), the Church can be considered the Ark of the Ark of the New Covenant.

But the type principally applies to Mary.

Confusingly, Noah's Ark was the type for the Church which is the New Ark.

494 posted on 10/09/2002 2:17:18 PM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Jesus Christ died, his blood was shed if you prefer, to offer the world eternal life in heaven. He open the gates.

So the blood of Jesus is ineffective..it has no power aside from your good works?

My Bible tells me Hbr 12:2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of [our] faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

Jhn 6:40   And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.

Hbr 1:3   Who being the brightness of [his] glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high; Past tense..a completed act

Atoning is not Christ's sacrifice to make. That is ours. Christ's sacrifice was the ultimate one, one which none of us can ever repay - he gave his life for us. The least we can do is his will.

The atonement was Christs to make..no man can pay the price..if he could why would God come down here and suffer himself..only HE could be the propitation

Rom 5:11   And not only [so], but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement.

Past tense

I'm sure she does. Regularly. She already had all the grace which we, in our lives, try to receive.

Do you make God your debtor? He owes your something? You do good so he owes you grace? I thought grace was Gods unmerited favor ????

495 posted on 10/09/2002 2:19:04 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
**Careful, now. I'm sitting here enjoying this thread and eating chocolate ice cream, and I don't want to have to worry that you're going to pop a blood vessel... **


I am afraId he will fall of the boat:>)
496 posted on 10/09/2002 2:20:17 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Which is why I prefer to call the protestant uprising a "revolt".

Can I join your movement? I usually refer to the "Protestant Revolution" rather than the "Protestant Reformation."

497 posted on 10/09/2002 2:20:18 PM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Did you inadvertently miss my post #461, or are you ignoring me:)

Becky

498 posted on 10/09/2002 2:23:39 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Do we all agree? No. CG and I go round in circles a lot.

Yea well cg does make ya go in circles:>) ..The fact is I have Catholic family and friends and they all have some things they accept and some things they don't...Some feel stronger on some points and some on others...

The difference is that Protestants find a church with like minded people rather than tough it out..

499 posted on 10/09/2002 2:24:00 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
Mary has a headdress with the 12 apostles in it.

Mary is the Church.

The Church is the Ark you get in to get saved.

Mary saves us.

The Church saves.

The Church is a big building, the bigger the better.

The Church is made up of believers. (in what, who knows? and who cares? it SAVES!)

Believers save.

Themselves and each other.

Therefore the believers are the Ark.

The believers are then the Saviors.

The Savior is God.

Believers are God.

Thanks to you and Quinas fan and Saint Calvin, I have seen the light.

your devoted disciple, His Emminence Jesse Mary Joseph 1st

500 posted on 10/09/2002 2:27:33 PM PDT by JesseShurun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 761-777 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson