Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
OK, my question is what is right or wrong with offering the Eucharist under both species? The parish I grew up in uses both species as long as I can remember, and a man or a woman can distribute them. The one I belong to now (and this is a much more orthodox parish, which I am thankful for) doesn't offer the wine, and I think only men handle the Ciborium. Can anyone explain why this is appropriate or not?
7 posted on 09/24/2002 7:21:02 AM PDT by GenXFreedomFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: GenXFreedomFighter
The general norm was that the Precious Blood (PLEASE, NOT "the wine") is only distributed on particular special occasions, such as First Communions, weddings, confirmation Masses, etc. and on certain feast days.

Recently the norm was expanded to include Sunday Masses, at least in the USA. There's nothing wrong with it--however, there are certain concerns that have to do with the general respect for the Eucharist which come into play in certain parishes.
9 posted on 09/24/2002 7:36:25 AM PDT by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: GenXFreedomFighter; All
Here is the reply of Father John Hardon (+ RIP) whose answers are reliable!

Q. Why are Catholics sometimes permitted to receive Holy Communion under both species and sometimes only permitted to receive the consecrated Host?

-G.M.E., Massachusetts

A.According to the Code of Canon Law, "Holy Communion is to be given under the form of bread and wine or under both kinds in accord with the norm of the liturgical laws or even under the form of wine, alone in case of necessity" (Canon 925). The Second Vatican Council has encouraged the reception of Holy Communion under both forms. Yet since the Vatican Council, there have been various qualifications which limit the administration of the Eucharist under the form of both bread and wine. The reason for this restriction is the liability to abuse of the Blessed Sacrament where the whole congregation, at every Mass, would receive from the chalice. Not the least of these abuses is consecration of such an abundance of wine that a large quantity of the Precious Blood is left over after Mass. Sacrilegious disposition of the consecrated chalice is not uncommon in some places. As a result, the normal procedure is to restrict the reception of communion under both species only to special occasions, such as weddings or certain solemn feasts. Moreover, the priests may administer Holy Communion by intinction. Here they dip the consecrated Host into the chalice and say to the communicant, "The Body and Blood of Christ."

10 posted on 09/24/2002 8:24:38 AM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson