[CCWoody]

Yes.

So, like I said originally, you must redefine nearly every gospel term to make it fit your theology. As there are certainly offensive things in this world, you must now redefine gospel terms so that you can make this problem go away.

But, really, you must back up your assertions of this type with other scriptures.

Of course, what is funny is that your theology destroys the hope of the saints.

[nate4one]

Of course, what is funny is that your theology destroys the hope of the saints.

Well when someone is holding onto a false hope that belonged to first century saints, then I guess you are right.

But my hope is in heaven. Not this earth as yours is.

I live in Pauls fulfilled hope. A Covenant not based on "laws" but on faith. A Covenant not based on a priesthood of man but on the One High Priest who alone can change my heart and bring it into His truth.
A Covenant that doesn't give authority to prideful fools who put their hope in a world of flesh rather than a kingdom of spirit.

What I have is better that what you hope, because it is REAL and true. And here and now!
What I have has built my faith in the King od kings.
What you have keeps men hoping for something that will never come. And will destroy manys faith. Because their hope is physical and false!!