[tpaine]

Absurd statement, easily demonstrated false by our earliest 'ethical' experiences.
IE - A toddler hurts a peer, and is 'hurt' in return, either by the other child, or disciplined by an adult. -- Neither child has attained the 'age of reason' or a sense of right or wrong, yet they both soon learn a "real world ethical lesson".

-- Do harm onto others, and they will do harm onto you.

Thus, -- Moralities DO exist, irregardless of beliefs. They are a product of real world cause & effect.
We need no 'god' to tell us what common sense illustrates.
_________________________________

For many, tpaine, 'ethics' goes beyond self-protection. As an example, many people (myself included) believe abortion is morally wrong - even though the about-to-be-born fetus can't possibly rise up and smite you. - YB -
___________________________________

You may think you need God to help you with what is right and wrong. That is your prerogative.

[yendu bwam]

You may think you need God to help you with what is right and wrong. That is your prerogative.

Hey, we agree on something!

[yendu bwam]

Here's one. Peter Singer, professor of 'ethics' at Princeton University, thinks we should be able to kill kids under age 2 if we don't want them (before, he says, they have a sense of self). The little tykes wouldn't be able to strike back against parents following Singer's ideas. What, in your view, makes such immoral? And what about partial-birth abortion? Immoral, in your view, or not?