Oh, so that's it. Maybe they can get Michael Rivero to link up "what really happened" on his website.
I should be used to the attacks by now, but sometimes I just fly off! He came on the thread and basically accused us of being mass murderers and then says I'm over sensitive when I flame him for his dumb post. And of course, I was supposed to look at his profile first--out of sheer curiousity of him I suppose.
To be deep in history is to be a Catholic, you and I know that. Funny that it's OK to read a Baptist version of the history of Christianity (probably written in the 20th century) and that is supposed to be taken as seriously as the Bible is, but it isn't OK for them to read the Early Church Fathers! I love it when you (Catholics) quote the Church Fathers who studied under the apostles or were close in history to them, and we get "Well, where is that in the Bible?" but we are supposed to read the Baptist Trail of Blood (and other modern biased writing of history) and take something written in the last 50 years or so as more truthful than a disciple of an apostle - ha ha!