Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ultima ratio
Dear ultima ratio,

"That's the big difference between traditionalists and conservatives. You ignore Vatican I as well as Trent; you exalt Vatican II and the popes who support it."

No, I ignore nothing. I especially do not ignore that it is given to Peter to guard the revelation transmitted through the apostles and the deposit of Faith, and that we are guaranteed that in the exercise of the Magisterium of the Holy Catholic Church, Peter will not lead the faithful astray.

I believe that it is you who ignore that you do not have the teaching office, and neither does any archbishop outside his communion with Peter.

sitetest

321 posted on 08/08/2002 2:54:52 PM PDT by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest
It is given to Peter to guard the revelation transmitted. But we are NOT guaranteed Peter won't screw up. He can decide to go hawking or wenching instead--or go off on a phenomenologist's tangent. That's the whole point of the Vatican I quote I gave. St. Peter did, as a matter of fact, make a big mistake--and St. Paul had to set him straight.

327 posted on 08/08/2002 3:24:41 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson