Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POPE'S ASTONISHING POWER HAS CHANGED THE WORLD
Spirit Daily ^ | July 27, 2002 | Michael Brown

Posted on 07/27/2002 2:54:34 PM PDT by NYer

From where I sit, Pope John Paul II is just across Lake Ontario. I'm visiting family in Niagara Falls, and from here you can nearly feel his power. It is not a political power. It's not so much a cultural force. It's a spiritual power -- a holy power. John Paul is the most powerful man on earth not because he controls an army or even because he leads a Church with more than one billion members, but because he is surrounded by the Holy Spirit.

That Spirit has descended on him because his life has been one of prayer, longsuffering, and sacrifice. Men cry in his presence -- uncontrollably. Women say they can feel his presence before he's even visible. Youths cheer as if the 82-year-old were a rock star. And the world has been changed by his presence. He has changed the world.

This is something the press doesn't like to report: that Karol Wojtyla, now known as Pope John Paul II, has affected mankind more than any other person in at least a century. Although we are quick to forget, for much of the twentieth century mankind lived under the constant threat of Communist Russia (as forecast at Fatima) and it was only through the intervention of John Paul II -- who prayed, who fasted, who directed Lech Walesa -- that Communism fell. Think of this: the man who was shot on the Fatima anniversary day of May 13, 1981, and whose shooting seemed presaged by the famous third secret and who himself became instrumental in releasing the third secret then became the instrument through which Communism -- the key concern at Fatima -- was defeated (at least in Europe and at least for the time being).

The greatest nemesis to Christianity, the red dragon -- which threatened to conquer the world and which threatened to annihilate our very belief in God -- was staved off by this heroic man due to his consecration of the world to the Immaculate Heart and through the purity of his life, which proves the power of celibacy.

Celibacy is like fasting and with fasting we can stop wars and even suspend the laws of nature.

This is what Karol Wojtyla, the Pope of the Fatima secret, has done, and it is a lesson to all the Church at a time when many question the issue of celibacy. Granted, one does not have to be celibate to be holy. There are married ministers and Orthodox priests who exude goodness -- and who have been heroic. There are married saints.

But the power behind John Paul II goes beyond what we see anywhere else, and as a result, he is subject to attack. There are those who dissent from him, who ridicule his age, or who defame him. This happens among radical Catholics as well as protestants (some of whom make the absurd, demented claim that he is the "anti-christ"; we saw one such radical website slip an article through our own net). In other cases, as with the media, they simply ignore his accomplishments.

But such is the power of John Paul that even those who don't attend church, or are not even Catholic, know he is the essence of goodness, a close link to God, a very close link, and he is this example to us all: that with self-sacrifice, with prayer and fasting, anything can be done, whether in our own lives or across this troubled planet. And it is through that self-immolation -- which continues with every labored step he takes -- that John Paul comes about as close as a human can to a state of perfection.


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: celibacy; fatima; media; pope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: NYer
Recite his strong points? Sure. He was directly responisble for liberating Eastern Europe from the evil empire. I read Carl Sandberg's biography and found it particularly compelling in its description of how he worked with Reagan and Reagan's cabinet--very quietly, behind the scenes. He is also a very holy prayerful man--I would say mystical. His early wish was to be a contemplative monk, a Carmelite priest. He is firm on moral principles and will not budge an inch on abortion or contraception or homosexuality. He is a brilliant phenomenologist who has written a prodigious number of encyclicals.

But he is a lousy adminsitrator. He has left appointments to others and these have led to an unusual number of corrupt episcopacies.The gay subculture has been allowed to proliferate--primarily due to this Pope's inattentiveness and naivte. But Christ warned of this. He said we should be like serpents. The children of the light have to learn from the children of darkness. In other words we have to toughen up and be realistic and at times ruthless in how we wield power. This Pope has been far too soft with apostates and perverts--and they have damaged the Church enormously and ruined many thousands of lives.

Yes, I find these World Youth bashes problematic. They are a celebration of joy, but they trivialize the faith and its difficulties. They also sanction a genre of music that is in openly hostile to reason and serenity. Why feed into such a culture? Do we assume the young will not listen unless we pander to them? Must we reverse roles and make the world's culture the model for the our own? This is an attitude that has spread from parish to parish throughout every level of the Church. It certainly smacks of pandering. The young want something more from the Church than more rock and roll and more noise and more youthful exhuberance.
22 posted on 07/27/2002 8:34:11 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
They also sanction a genre of music that is in openly hostile to reason and serenity.

Gosh. I'm 51, and you're older (though you're younger) than I am.

You're a humorless young man, my friend.

23 posted on 07/27/2002 8:38:27 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Ever hear of Mexico? Of course there are twenty million more Catholics! Mexicans have been migrating north for decades, particularly in the last thirty years. The country's population has almost doubled since 1950. As for my statistics, they are Gallup's and I got them from Traditio.com. But it's amusing to hear people like you say this, as if it weren't common knowledge among the cognicenti.
24 posted on 07/27/2002 8:46:04 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
The country's population has almost doubled since 1950. As for my statistics, they are Gallup's and I got them from Traditio.com.

You're new here (at least in your latest incarnation), so you should know that if you cite statistics, the least you can do is provide a link to the site from which they came.

I'd like to see the statistics that back up your claim, but I'm not going to scrounge around looking for them.

25 posted on 07/27/2002 8:50:35 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Before you think I mean that this country has almost doubled in its population because of migration from Mexico, let me say that was not my meaning. We all played a part.
26 posted on 07/27/2002 8:55:27 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I will try to back up the statistics, or else avoid them. But once I get typing, the attacks start and there isn't much time to do research. But hey, believe what you want. If you want to think the country stayed put at 150,000,000 people, fine. Common sense would suggest otherwise, however. I know it's something like 250,000,000--but it is probably much higher. My point is still valid.
27 posted on 07/27/2002 9:01:03 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
What's to be humorous about? You and others have been clobbering me left and right because I point out the obvious. I'm really a funny guy with my friends and family.
28 posted on 07/27/2002 9:27:15 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
By the way, who ever told you the decline started in the fifties? That is really funny. I have to agree, you are a very funny guy.

29 posted on 07/27/2002 9:38:22 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I did the research: I was exactly right. There are a whole lot of great polls by Gallup at this site:

www.traditio.com/tradlib/polls.txt

Bon appetit!
30 posted on 07/27/2002 10:42:37 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio; Siobhan; Salvation; Bud McDuell; sinkspur
I was a seminarian myself in the 80's and met many fine devout young men. But I met weirdos as well-- too many of them. What troubled me most was the lack of faith. The Blessed Sacrament, for instance, was kept in a room in the basement. Only myself and one other guy ever made a visit.

Most of the catholics on FreeRepublic would probably consider themselves "traditionalists". We love our church, like you, and would abhor the notion that the Eucharist (the Living Presence of Christ among us) had been relegated to some obscure room in the basement of a seminary. In fact, once Siobhan reads this post, you will probably have an opportunity to meet her Irish banshee.

Ten years ago, a young couple moved into the neighborhood where I resided at the time. As it turns out, the husband, like you, had been a seminarian in the '80's. He was so scandalized by what he encountered in the seminary, that he chose the secular life. We, in this forum, have read and discussed this issue countless times. It pains us immensely to know that many good men who answered the call to serve God, were confronted with radical teachings and felt compelled to leave. Such a decision must feel as though one had to say "no" to Christ, Himself, whose service you sought through the priesthood he created at the Last Supper. To hold the Holy Father solely accountable for these events, does him a terrible disservice. While western seminaries shrank during that time frame, the catholic seminaries in Africa exploded with wonderful priests. There are other factors at work here, but it would take multiple threads to fully explore how this shift to liberal teachings occurred where it did, who abeted the process and how much of this information actually filtered back to "who" in Rome. Were I in your position, I would be equally angry.

Yes, I find these World Youth bashes problematic. They are a celebration of joy, but they trivialize the faith and its difficulties. They also sanction a genre of music that is in openly hostile to reason and serenity.

Here again, you will find that among the catholics in this forum, there are those who feel we should turn back the clock and restore the Tridentine Mass, along with Gregorian chant. I was educated by the nuns during the late '50's and the only mass then was the Tridentine format. I remember people fainting in church, after fasting from midnight, in order to receive communion. I also vividly recall the sudden changes that occurred immediately following Vatican II. The school year ended with nuns in habits. When we returned in September, we didn't recognize them in their new street clothes. Kumbaya became the song of choice at school masses. From one week to the next, altars were either turned around or new ones were brought in and slapped down in front of the old ones. Where once the host could never be touched by anyone other than the priest, suddenly they were being distributed by women with heavily perfumed fingers.

Vatican II also brought some beautiful changes. I personally thrill to watch the priest consecrate the host and would not want to return to a passive mass like the Tridentine one where I was nothing more than an observer. My personal choice for a mass format would be the one celebrated by the Franciscans on EWTN. It incorporates the best of both worlds.

As for the music ministry, my personal choice leans towards the more traditional organ and choir. Yet, I have found myself moved to tears by some of the contemporary musicians.

If you watched the Way of the Cross on EWTN the other night, you may have heard the commentator mention that the music comes from the Taize Community. Taize is a Christian, monastic community in southeastern France. Brother Roger founded Taize partly in response to the violence of WWII that he encountered. It has since become a pilgrimage site for young people mostly from Europe, however people from other continents come to Taize. At any one time there can be 200 to 2000 people visiting.

The daily routine at Taize includes three prayer or worship periods, the sharing of simple meals, Bible study led by the brothers, small group discussions, chores and times of silence. Those who take part in the life of Taize focus on simplicity, service, trust and reconciliation.

"A life of prayer is at the center of Taize," explained Brother Pedro. Many of the Taize prayers are single sentences or phrases that are sung repetitively as a way of centering and becoming open. For some it is a form of meditation, for others it is a way of listening for the Divine.

Adoramus Te Christe, et benedictimus tibit (sp?) was one of several centering prayers sung by the youth at World Youth Day. The youth choir sang songs in French, Italian, English, Spanish and Latin.

Welcome, again, to Free Republic. I believe you will find yourself in good company in this community. Before you jump to conclusions, though, and castigate the pope and church for everything you abhor, step back and take a second look, weighing one against the other. Hang around this forum long enough, and you will discover some truly beautiful and remarkable catholics. May I add you to my ping list?

Pax et Bonum

31 posted on 07/28/2002 4:04:34 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: NYer
Your posts show such wonderful charity that I want to say Thank You. You join those like patent and sitetest and polycarp who have done so much here to make thise of us who are new feel welcome. Again, thank you.
33 posted on 07/28/2002 9:07:20 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bud McDuell
Bud McDuell signed up 2002-07-17

Welcome aboard, Bud, and fasten your seatbelt. You're in for an interesting journey here on this site. Let me know if you want on my ping list.

Pax et Bonum

34 posted on 07/28/2002 9:15:48 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: narses
thank you.

Thank you, narses, for sharing your insight and wisdom with this catholic freeper community. I am a strong believer that people can inspire each other and have found that to be very true on this forum. Perhaps like St. Francis, we can answer the call of Christ to "repair his church".

35 posted on 07/28/2002 9:24:28 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
"But he has been a bad steward and a failure as a pope. "

I has also came to this conclusion but have since changed. I read an explanation from someone who appeared to be 'in the loop' in an article about the Jesuits. The point made was the Pope has a Darwinian approach and will allow various orders of Priests, Sisters, etc to die (or in effect to allow their policies and practices to kill themselves off). The faithful will survive and the others will perish in the same manner as Communist Russia.

36 posted on 07/28/2002 10:43:39 AM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NYer; narses
Removing the Tabernacle to the basement is the sort of diabolical monkeying around that does bring out the banshee in me.

Perhaps "ultima ratio" will stay around long enough to prove himself, but I have no use for someone who on several threads attacks the Holy Father and who attacks me personally as well as my faith. Such a person is despicable and beneath contempt.

37 posted on 07/28/2002 10:55:52 AM PDT by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Your theory is interesting and I wish I could buy it. In fact, it may well apply to the Jesuits themselves, since you mention them. It is a dying order. But the idea that the Pope is passively allowing this to happen, doesn't account for his lack of action in other spheres--his bad, even disastrous appointments. He has just appointed Kasper to the cardinalate, for instance, thus making one of the most liberal of bishops papabile. He alone has elevated an incredible number of bad bishops, far in excess of what is usual. It ought to have been clear two decades ago that he had a systemic problem, that the corruption was wider and deeper than he supposed. Catholic laymen knew about it and complained constantly to the Vatican. The Wanderer and the Remnant wrote about these things for decades. And yet it has been business as usual. When the American cardinals went to Rome, no one was asked for his resignation, no one was repremanded. There was a luncheon and some p.r. press conferences. Clearly the call to Rome was an exercise in damage control. Yet Cardinal Law is a man who had gone out of his way to effusively praise in writing a priest he knew had raped a six year old in an effort to foist him on another diocese. He had tolerated this priest's activism on behalf of NAMBLA and allowed him to ruin the lives of countless children. And so with the others. Mahoney has been protecting a slew of abusers--as many as 72 according to LA newspaper reports yesterday. There are bishops and cardinals who hit on seminarians, bishops and cardinals who pick up male prostitutes, etc., etc., and this has been happening for decades all around the globe. Yet no effort is made to clean out the seminaries which produce these perverts.
38 posted on 07/28/2002 3:28:34 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
You make your point. However, I'm sure he acts on the recommendations of local ordinaries. I still like the Darwinian theory. A country will get the kind of leaders they deserve. (But about the same as we do).
39 posted on 07/28/2002 3:40:42 PM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Thank you for a beautiful welcome. I will agree the pre-Conciliar Church was not perfect. It was probably not the paradise most traditionalists imagine. But it was infinitely preferable to what followed. As for my view of the Pope, I am sorry if I offend so many, but he has the power to clean house and will not use it. It is said he fears schism on the left. But I believe it is more than that. He favors liberal reform over tradition. He makes this abundantly clear in many ways. But as St. Paul said in the opening to his letter to the Galatians, "If anyone preach a gospel to you other than the gospel which you received, let him be anathema." He said that even if an angel came down from heaven and preached such a gospel, he should be outcast. Yet there are cardinals who question the Resurrection, who have doubts about the Real Presence, who wonder about Christ's divinity. Who elevated such men? Just the same, you are very kind to welcome me despite my brashness.
40 posted on 07/28/2002 3:45:55 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson