Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican: Jews do not wait in vain for Messiah
Christianity Today ^ | 07/24/2002 | LaTonya Taylor

Posted on 07/26/2002 7:24:27 PM PDT by narses

According to a new Vatican document, recently released in English, Jews should continue to anticipate the coming of Messiah.

The Pontifical Biblical Commission released the English version of "The Jewish People and their Sacred Scriptures in the Christian Bible" in May. Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger signed the work.

"The Jewish Messianic wait is not in vain," the statement says. "It can become for us Christians a strong stimulus to maintain alive the eschatological dimension of our faith. We, like them, live in expectation. The difference is in the fact that for us, he who will come will have the traits of that Jesus who has already come and is already active and present among us."

The document is the latest of several that some believe suggest the church is softening its stance toward Jews and their salvation. For example, several scholars said Dominus Iesus, a 2000 document that reaffirms that salvation comes through Christ and the church, does not apply to Jews the way it does to members of other non-Christian religions.

Two Covenants? Darrell Bock, professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, noted that the new statement seems to imply belief in a two-covenant view of salvation. "This would undercut evangelism to Jews and does not make sense of the efforts of the earliest church to reach out to Jews as seen in the New Testament," Bock told Christianity Today. "On the key question of whether Judaism can save, the document is very unclear."

John Pawlikowski, director of the Catholic-Jewish Studies program at the University of Chicago, said the statement raises questions about the way the church understands Jews and salvation. "It demands some kind of further reflection on the significance of the universality of Christ's redemptive action," he said. "To what extent, then, does their salvation depend primarily on their own covenant rather than, say, on the universal work of Christ?"

The statement is "like the camel's nose of universalism in the tent of the Catholic Church," said David Brickner, executive director of Jews for Jesus. "Jesus is the Messiah of the Jews, or he's no one's Messiah.

"I think it's important for us as evangelicals to recognize that the Catholic Church has long given up the notion of a forthright evangelistic outreach to the Jewish people," Brickner said. "The evangelical church should see this as a cautionary tale. The uniqueness of Christ is what's at stake."

Relations with Jews Yechiel Eckstein, founder of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, said the statement could help Christians respond to Jews in a way that is respectful, but does not compromise Christian beliefs.

Eugene Fisher, associate director for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said the document may help Jews and Christians pursue a more intense level of interfaith dialogue using their shared Scriptures.

"It provides a solid basis of understanding for a local congregation to speak to a local synagogue—not only on social issues that we can get together on, but precisely on 'Let's talk about how we understand, say, the Book of Genesis,' " he said.

Leon Klenicki, a past president of the Anti-Defamation League, said the statement is good for Catholic-Jewish relations. But, he said, the document only describes Jewish beliefs and does not grant them theological validity.

Brickner cautions that interfaith dialogue, though valuable, should not replace evangelism. "This document demonstrates that those who have in one sense given up evangelism and replaced it with dialogue ultimately end up compromising the essence of the gospel itself."

Despite questions, many religious leaders say the statement is a valuable step forward. Mary Boys, professor of practical theology at Union Theological Seminary, said the study's emphasis on reading the Scriptures in their original context is helpful in correcting "the disparagement of Judaism that has been like a virus in Christian theology."

Marvin Wilson, author of Our Father Abraham: Jewish Roots of the Christian Faith, agrees. "For nearly 2,000 years, the Christians took the Jewish Scriptures and proceeded to essentially disregard Jewish scholarship and Jewish interpretation."

Wilson, professor of biblical and theological studies at Gordon College in Wenham, Massachusetts, says evangelicals need to hear the Jewish Scriptures "as a word meant for Israel, not just the word that gets validated for us because we can spiritualize it or Christolocize it, validating it by some kind of New Testament connection."


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: narses
To be picky, it is STILL part of the Canon of the of the Holy Mass, just not the one most Catholics today hear.

Sadly that is true.

21 posted on 07/27/2002 9:34:42 AM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: narses; sinkspur
Haven't there been more than one message from Our Lady and Saints about the suffering souls in Hell?

I thought Our Lady of Fatima specifically requested that this little prayer be said at the end of each decade of the Rosary: "O my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of Hell, and lead all souls to Heaven, especially those most in need of Thy mercy."

I've grown so used to it in the more than 40 years since I learned it that I automatically add after any Gloria Patri, in the Rosary or not.

22 posted on 07/27/2002 10:31:46 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: Bud McDuell
shouldn't they make an effort to bring all souls to Christ?

One should indeed. But one should be sure that one's methods do so -- and don't actually work more to turn the others against any mention of Christ, His church and the would-be evangelizer.

24 posted on 07/27/2002 1:04:17 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: narses; George W. Bush; JHavard; Havoc; OLD REGGIE; Iowegian; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; ...
Two Covenants? Darrell Bock, professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, noted that the new statement seems to imply belief in a two-covenant view of salvation. "This would undercut evangelism to Jews and does not make sense of the efforts of the earliest church to reach out to Jews as seen in the New Testament," Bock told Christianity Today. "On the key question of whether Judaism can save, the document is very unclear."

John Pawlikowski, director of the Catholic-Jewish Studies program at the University of Chicago, said the statement raises questions about the way the church understands Jews and salvation. "It demands some kind of further reflection on the significance of the universality of Christ's redemptive action," he said. "To what extent, then, does their salvation depend primarily on their own covenant rather than, say, on the universal work of Christ?"

This touches at the heart of Christian evangelism. I agree with the two writers above

A FYI bump

25 posted on 07/27/2002 1:18:42 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I have a problem with Polyanna Catholicism, all this hugging, all this schmoozing the Pope does with World Youth, all this apologizing that makes us laughing stocks. A saccharine Jesus and an uninhabited Hell is typical liberal schmaltz, not to mention revisionist wishful thinking.
26 posted on 07/27/2002 1:48:33 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Right on. Welcome to the all-new, revised Catholic religion. By the way, the Church of Christ--which used to BE the Catholic Church-- now merely SUBSISTS in it, according to the Novus Ordo who make it up as they go along. I'm all for friendship with the Jews. But not at the expense of the truth. This is sheer pandering.
27 posted on 07/27/2002 1:57:11 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
I have a problem with Polyanna Catholicism, all this hugging, all this schmoozing the Pope does with World Youth, all this apologizing that makes us laughing stocks.

I suspect you have a problem with a lot of things.

The Pope with young people bothers you?

You're like every other SSPXer I've ever met: creepy.

You've already been sufficiently hammered by others on this site, so I'll just say, have a nice day and smile once in a while.

28 posted on 07/27/2002 2:13:02 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sock
Where in the Catholic Catechism does the phrase "We know there to be souls in hell" occur? Yes. Hell exists. Do we know as a matter of faith that there are souls in hell?
29 posted on 07/27/2002 2:15:14 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: narses
Haven't there been more than one message from Our Lady and Saints about the suffering souls in Hell?

Are private apparitions part of the Magisterium of the Church?

30 posted on 07/27/2002 2:18:03 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Oh, I don't mind hammering, so long as I can hammer back. Does the Pope with young people bother me? Yes. And I'll tell you why. Because we don't need any more sucking up to the young. What they need is straight talk to help them resist the world's temptations. The last thing they need from the Church is more rock and roll. But for twenty-five years he's been going to these things and for twenty-five years a whole generation of Catholics have been losing more and more of the Faith. During this time he should have cleaned out the seminaries. He should have appointed men of character for the episcopate, not the collection of apostates and perverts who serve him now. We have enough movie stars. We need somebody to clean house and preach the Gospel straight.


31 posted on 07/27/2002 3:18:02 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
"Church of Christ--which used to BE the Catholic Church-- now merely SUBSISTS in it"

Why is this controversial?

If the Church of Christ SUBSISTS in the Catholic Church then surely it cannot SUBSIST anywhere else?

This emphasis allows for the fact that there are those apparently within the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church militant who are not in fact within the Church of Christ - and who consequently will not be saved - e.g. one of the Apostles - Judas.

"Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus" does not imply that within the Church ALL WILL be saved.
32 posted on 07/27/2002 3:18:58 PM PDT by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"Does the Church teach that there are souls in hell? It certainly teaches that there are souls in heaven, but, to my knowledge, I've never seen a teaching about souls in hell."

John 17:12 While I was with them, I kept them in thy name. Those whom thou gavest me have I kept; and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition, that the scripture may be fulfilled.

Jesus here confirms that Judas is in hell. In semitic thought to call someone the "son of ...." describes either their origin OR their destiny. As Judas cannot have come from hell, Our Lord can only mean that he was going and now is there.

As far as I know there is no other teaching about any certain individual being in hell, but there is plenty of authoritative teaching confirming that there are many souls in hell as well as the devil and his angels.
33 posted on 07/27/2002 3:28:48 PM PDT by Tantumergo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Hell exists. Do we know as a matter of faith that there are souls in hell?

No, of course there are no souls in hell. God just invented hell to scare us. It's just a big, empty furnace. And Purgatory is just a comfortable waiting room for acceptance into Heaven.

You contend that there may be no one in hell. If that is the case, everyone is either in heaven or on their way there. Why then should one bother with their silly religious squabbles, for we are all saved. Alleluia!

34 posted on 07/27/2002 3:43:32 PM PDT by Land of the Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I don't know. But frankly, unless you are willing to deny them and the Catechism and 2,000 years of teachings of the Church, you have to admit both the existance and the population of Hell. Otherwise, why be Catholic? If no one ever has or ever will go to Hell, why not just do what feels good? You take a very odd position for someone who attacks me and my Catholicism sinkspur.
35 posted on 07/27/2002 3:47:11 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tantumergo
There is a huge difference between stating that the Church of Christ is the Catholic Church and the Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church. This is a major change in how Catholics think of themselves. To use the verb "is" is to establish identity. To use the verb "subsist" is deliberately ambiguous. It could mean a number of things: to live within something or to remain within something. In other words, the Church that now exists is not necessarily the Church that Christ founded, though some elements may live or remain within it. Then again, the door is open to the idea that some elements are elsewhere as well, with Lutherans or Methodists or Baptists, for instance. If so, why bother to evangelize other Christians? (And indeed, we no longer do.) This distinction has had enormous consequences. But more than this, it is a revolutionary idea--and not a very Catholic one. It denigrates the past and all past efforts. It's as if the Church were newly conceived during the modernist take-over of Vatican II and all that preceded it were wrong-headed and obsolete. But if this is so, where are the fruits of this new modernist Church? Where is the springtime of Faith it promised thirty-five years ago? Instead of a flowering of the Faith there has been a winter of political correctness and corruption.
36 posted on 07/27/2002 3:49:49 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: maryz
I say that prayer many times every day.
37 posted on 07/27/2002 3:51:16 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: narses
If no one ever has or ever will go to Hell, why not just do what feels good?

How about for the love of God?

38 posted on 07/27/2002 3:54:35 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Does the Church teach that there are souls in hell? It certainly teaches that there are souls in heaven, but, to my knowledge, I've never seen a teaching about souls in hell.

I don't what the Catholic Church teaches precisely, but here is a teaching by Christ from scripture:

Luke 16:19-31 The Rich Man and Lazarus

Now there was a rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen, joyously living in splendor every day. And a poor man named Lazarus was laid at his gate, covered with sores, and longing to be fed with the crumbs which were falling from the rich man's table; besides, even the dogs were coming and licking his sores. Now the poor man died and was carried away by the angels to Abraham's bosom; and the rich man also died and was buried. In Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham far away and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried out and said, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue, for I am in agony in this flame.' But Abraham said, 'Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony. 'And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.' And he said, 'Then I beg you, father, that you send him to my father's house-- for I have five brothers--in order that he may warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.' But Abraham said, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.' But he said, 'No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!' But he said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.'

I would also point out, this passage is not qualified as a parable or story and in fact may be literal.
39 posted on 07/27/2002 4:04:04 PM PDT by Starwind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maryz
That is the perfect answer. The imperfect answer is the fear of God. At least that's what I have been taught. Perhaps sinkspur can re-educate me. He seems to think I am less Catholic than he says he is.
40 posted on 07/27/2002 4:12:30 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson