Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When The Pope's Friends Walk Away
TCRnews.com ^ | 7-25-2002 | Stephen Hand

Posted on 07/25/2002 5:31:43 AM PDT by Notwithstanding

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 521-531 next last
To: ultima ratio
Avery Dulles concedes the point.

what point?

201 posted on 07/26/2002 6:09:01 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
When he started his website the divisions among Catholics were less clear and so was terminology.

Wrong. The schismatic right was opposing the Ecumenical Council. the Pope, Canon Law, Encyclicals LONG before TCRnews was launched

202 posted on 07/26/2002 6:10:55 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

Comment #203 Removed by Moderator

To: ultima ratio
Can anyone name a single heretical view held by SSPX

The Angelus has published that the normative Mass does not fulfill one's Sunday obligation as it is invalid. Telling supporters of the sspx schism that the Catholic Church has a normative Mass that is invalid is described as what, in your vocabulary

204 posted on 07/26/2002 6:15:27 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
In what way did I mischarecterize it? My words were exact, specific and accurate. Please try and NOT misrepresent what I say and what I believe.
205 posted on 07/26/2002 6:18:33 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
But the nasty and arrogant and patronizing judging of mens' souls and mens' motives must stop.

"Let there be peace on earth and let it begin with me.." :) S.H. has never judged another's soul nor is he judging motive. He is describing actions that indicate, to him, the path that certain individuals are on.

It USED to be considered a "traditional" idea that one would warn others of the proximate danger their actions might lead to

I think you are "too close" to the conflict to judge it accurately

206 posted on 07/26/2002 6:20:17 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
You keep repeating that, are you honestly and completely reporting what was actually published? Your bias is clear. Have you a link?
207 posted on 07/26/2002 6:22:04 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Dear ultima ratio,

I read Cardinal Dulles' article. He doesn't seem to concede any points at all.

sitetest

208 posted on 07/26/2002 6:22:11 AM PDT by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
I disagree. SH branded me as polycarp (I am not) and an "integrist" (I am still unsure what he means by that as he would never explain himself). He does judge others and he does so based on flawed reasoning and in the face of fact, even after correction. That you embrace and defend him in the face of his own conduct speaks volumes.
209 posted on 07/26/2002 6:23:57 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Bud McDuell
So when Pope St. Pius V said that anyone who "changes the Mass let him be anathema" does that mean that all the hierarchy involved in the creation of the Novus Ordo will go to hell?

That was standard boilerplate rhetoric for Encyclicals of that time. There is another Encyclical of that time that uses the same language in warning others not to change the brievary. Of course, it was changed but we don't hear schismatics ranting about that - prolly cause Michael Davies hasn't written an essay about that.

It seems very presumptuous for you to be judging the soul Archbishop Lefbvre. Where's the "John Paul II We Love You" crowd in extendeing charity to Lefbvre?

I didn't judge his soul. Charity was extended to Lefebvre in a monumental fashion. It was never returned. Rome wen the extra 10,000 miles trying to accomodate him.

210 posted on 07/26/2002 6:27:04 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Nubbin; Siobhan; patent; Notwithstanding; sitetest; Catholicguy
I was shocked to learn that many catholics (including your own dear Da) were on the receiving end of hateful, threatening emails.

Its only been a couple days since I openly proclaimed my identity here on FRee Republic, and re-posted the HTML on my profile page. Already the hateful internet emails have resumed. Here's one from yesterday:

After reading your "culture of death" article (which I accidentally stumbled across) I feel very sorry for you. It seems that your feeling of self-worth is wrapped tightly to your heavy-handed judgment of other people. You claim to be a Roman Catholic, yet in your article you seem to ignore the teachings of Jesus Christ concerning judgments, forgiveness, humility and charity.

By your photograph it seems that you have an eating disorder. Such things say much ... much more than words ... about how a person really feels about him- or herself. Seek spiritual healing and it will manifest physically in your person. Teach from the heart, not from ritual or from formulaic and unchallenged generalizations.

I am glad that you love your children and happy for them that they have a loving father. But just consider ...

thousands, perhaps millions of people are being saved right now in Africa because of contraception;

loving gay and lesbian couples are giving to each other, to their churches and to their communities the only way they can. [Are you aware that some of the heroes of 9/11 were gay?] Perhaps a gay man or a lesbian woman will one day save your life, or your child's life. Would you still damn him or her to hell?

There may be nothing I can write in this e-mail message that will help you. But then again, maybe something I write will get you thinking. Small town doesn't matter. Small mind does.

I mean you no harm. In fact, I wish you well and leave you with a blessing. To the extent I have judged you, I apologize. To the extent my words may help you, I give thanks to God.

I wonder if its worth it...

*****

The bashers, those who don't understand or hate the faith, are one thing...but this recent phenomena of catholics tearing each other apart on the forum is much more discouraging IMO.

Frankly, there is always give and take among Catholic FReepers here. That is normal and healthy.

However, nerves are frayed beyond any semblance of normal by the homosexual abuse crisis in the Church. Some of us are actively dealing with and helping victims themselves, and in that respect its hard to stay objective. It is very disconcerting to hear these stories then see the lack of action by our hierarchy at and following Dallas to the homosexual roots of the crisis.

Everyone is searching for the root cause and possible solutions.

It serves no purpose to heap scorn on those honestly searching for answers.

And frankly, isn't it at least worth noting that the worst examples of this recent phenomena of catholics tearing each other apart on the forum have revolved around either editorials by TCRNews.com or posts on the forum by their staffers, because of the way they are maligning good faithful Catholics seeking answers and solutions in their own humble way?

That is primarily my point in all of this.

211 posted on 07/26/2002 6:28:52 AM PDT by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: narses
We have ploughed this same field several times. I am not going to go over this again with you. Bookmark the decision and the explanation. I know you reject it so your arguement is with the Pope, not me
212 posted on 07/26/2002 6:34:08 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
In my Novus Ordo parish: "everything is done to alert the faithful to His actual presence on the altar. Bells are rung. People fall to their knees. A hush descends."


As an analogy:
I have been to the traditional Latin Mass and sat in the back and noticed that few people were paying much attention to what was going on throughout the Mass. Is that a reason to condemn that form of the Mass? Of course not.



213 posted on 07/26/2002 6:39:09 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Bob Bennett? No way! Can you confirm this?

Go to the 9th paragraph.

214 posted on 07/26/2002 6:39:18 AM PDT by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
Actually not. You claim I mischarecterized the decision. I clearly did not. Try and see the difference. Like your friend SH your are unfairly and seemingly dishonestly maligning me. If you can show me where, on this thread, I mischarecterized either the decision or the status of the entities involved, I will apologize.
215 posted on 07/26/2002 6:39:21 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: narses
Dear narses,

I assume that you're referring to the Assyrian rite as heretical. If that's so, please explain why you consider them in heresy.

Thanks.

sitetest

216 posted on 07/26/2002 6:42:50 AM PDT by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
And frankly, isn't it at least worth noting that the worst examples of this recent phenomena of catholics tearing each other apart on the forum have revolved around either editorials by TCRNews.com or posts on the forum by their staffers,

This was happening LONG before S.H. signed on as a Freeper. Trying to make TCR responsible makes no sense. I take responsibility for my part in the arguement. I have decided to speak as forcefully and as persuasively as I can with and to those who oppose the Pope, the Magisterium, the normative Mass, Encyclicals. For me, the gloves are off and I don't accept the "no enemies on the right" idea because those on the right will NOT cease their criticism of The Magisterium and they specialise in attacking the Pope.

217 posted on 07/26/2002 6:43:19 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Catholicguy
In point of fact, my argument is NOT with the Pope, it is with Card. Kasper and what I believe is a flawed decision of his. You might really want to try harder to not mischarecterize what I believe or what I say. I would appreciate that greatly.
218 posted on 07/26/2002 6:43:25 AM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: narses; Polycarp
Is Stephen Hand FReeper? What is his name here?
219 posted on 07/26/2002 6:44:30 AM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
and, it is worth noting that many folks just used to pray the Rosary during Mass and many Masses were said in under 30 mins. My old priest in Vt, could say the Mass in 18 mins :)
220 posted on 07/26/2002 6:45:05 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 521-531 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson