In charity, in his defense, I must point out that he has done some excellent work with his website, and some things he has written have been written well, with keen intellect and insight. I would never have allowed him to post any of my own writings on his site if there were no merit to his work.
But he has too much subjective involvement regarding traditionalism, having once been an integrist himself, and when he debates he paints anyone who disagrees with him as an integrist, extreme trad, or enemy of the Holy Father. That is bad form, uncharitable, and frankly psychologically unstable.
And labeling him "psychologically unstable" is charitable and good form?
I missed all the fun on this thread but I would like to note that I have disagreed with him previously and he didn't call me an enemy of the Pope or an extreme Trad or any of things you claim he calls folks when a disagreement arises.