Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
This guy's newest book was reviewed in the New York Times (I think it was Sunday's book review section, for some reason I get the "extra" sections of Sunday's paper on Saturday) and they alluded to the fact that this guy has some problems with the church as a result of him being a former seminarian. I think it said he was a Jesuit, and before he left the order he was having serious problems with the idea that we are actually on the earth and that his experiences were not all a dream. The review in the New York Times also noted that he does not seem to be well versed in any theologians who are pre-Vatican II, and if he is, he never uses them in his research.
7 posted on 07/14/2002 10:22:29 AM PDT by FBDinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


I found the Book Review that I mentioned in the post above. Here's a quote from the article:

The final section of ''The Vatican II Church'' and the climax of the book as a whole is a manifesto entitled ''The Pope's Loyal Opposition.'' Here Wills states and vigorously argues the 11 conditions on which ''support of the papacy is possible for the conscientious.'' Drawing on the history of the preceding chapters, he asserts: (1) The papacy is a deeply flawed institution. (2) The church itself is a deeply flawed institution. (3) There have been many papacies. (4) One is obliged to differ from the papacy. (5) The papacy, like the church, changes. (6) Change in the papacy has not been unidirectional. (7) The historical reality of papal teaching has little to do with infallibility. (8) The essence of the papacy is the Petrine charism. (9) The papacy is the sacrament of the unity of the church. (10) Heresy is a sin against this sacrament of unity. (11) The papacy, as a center of unity, has many sources of renewal.

After this catharsis, the jejune 40-page commentary on the creed that ends this otherwise candid, richly informative and perfectly timed book comes as an anticlimax and a distinct disappointment, not least for its studied indifference to contemporary American Catholic theology. Wills reads selected contemporary church historians and three or four Scripture scholars, but with one exception he finds no theologian since John Henry Newman worth a word of either praise or blame, not even Avery Dulles -- a famous American convert become a Jesuit and now, like Newman, a cardinal -- whose ''Models of the Church'' has done more than any other book to keep alive in the American Catholic Church the very ''People of God'' ecclesiology in which Wills has invested such hope.

Why this abstention from theology? The opening, autobiographical portion of the book may offer a clue. As a Jesuit novice, Wills underwent a crisis of faith in reality itself: does anything exist, or are we trapped in a dream? He survived that crisis with the help of a sensitive confessor and the chapter entitled ''The Suicide of Thought'' in G. K. Chesterton's ''Orthodoxy.'' A few years later, Wills left the Society of Jesus; but from that moment to this, Chesterton's vision of ''the mystical minimum'' -- gratitude to God for the miracle that anything at all is -- seems to have remained for him an intellectual bedrock too deep or too private for discussion.

8 posted on 07/14/2002 10:31:21 AM PDT by FBDinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: FBDinNJ
Wills is both an ex-Jesuit and an ex-conservative, fast on his way to being a stereotypical ex-Catholic. When he finally makes up his mind, presumably he will have passed through Unitarianism, Theosophy, Transcendentalism, and the various schools of Buddhism and Tantric Yoga.
80 posted on 07/17/2002 7:20:58 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson