To: Matchett-PI
I think it all depends on what you mean by "closed canon."
249 posted on
06/23/2002 2:17:40 PM PDT by
RobbyS
To: RobbyS; Matchett-PI
I think it all depends on what you mean by "closed canon."Indeed it does, particularly if he means observing the Council of Jamnia's edited version of the Old Testament.
To: RobbyS; FormerLib; livius; drstevej; Polycarp; RnMomof7; HASH(0x8c7a398); No Truce With Kings; ...
"I think it all depends on what you mean by "closed canon."
The preservation and correct assembling of the canon of Scripture was an integral part of the history of redemption itself. Just as God was at work in creation, calling his people Isreal, in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ, and in the early work and writings of the apostles, so God was at work in the preservation and assembling together of the books of Scripture for the benefit of his people for the entire church age.
God's greatest revelation to mankind was written down by the apostles. We have everything we need to know about the life, death and resurrection of Christ, and its meaning for the lives of believers for all time.
No more writings can be added to the Bible after the time of the New Testament.[Heb 1:1-2 Rev.22:18-19]
Only those who don't believe that God is sovereign would doubt his faithfulness to his people and think that he would allow something to be missing from Scripture for almost 2,000 years that he thinks we need to know for obeying him and trusting him fully. The canon of Scripture today is exactly what God wanted it to be, and it will stay that way until Christ returns.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson