[Heartlander]

I answered you on Dembski already. When you repeat what people have already answered, and to the same people at that, clearly inviting what programmers call an "infinite loop," you risk turning into gore3000.

Vade, you answered it with your “infinite God-did-it loop” which could easily be substituted for an “infinite nature-did-it loop” with the exception, ironically, of predicting future events.

[VadeRetro]

Vade, you answered it with your “infinite God-did-it loop” which could easily be substituted for an “infinite nature-did-it loop” with the exception, ironically, of predicting future events.

No. I critiqued Dembski's entire article earlier. If you're too dumb to remember, then stop bothering me.

[VadeRetro]

Response 1, Dembski article,

Response 2, Dembski article.