[PuNcH]

If you don't "believe" in science, it means you think either that your senses are lying to you, that logic is meaningless, or that god is playing tricks on us all by sprinkling the world with false evidence, such as the fossil record. A twisted sense of humor, I guess.

That is interesting. So then is the fossil record what it is or what evolutionists want it to be?

[whattajoke]

you have worded your question very well. But truth be told, scientists would love for the fossil record to be simple, perfect, and concise. Unfortunately, fossils are rare indeed as the particulars in forming them do not readily occur. Of course, if we had A-Z fossils from, say, early primate to man (simplifying for clarity here) and presented them to "creationist science peer review" (as if that existed) the scientists would be scoffed at and asked to come up with A1, A2, A3 and so forth ad infinitum. Its an impossible task...well, except in easily verifiable examples such as isolated populations or viruses...but thats apparently not good enough. cheers!