Replies

Still waiting for the irrefutable evidence Gore.

You already saw it in post#1754. That post shows that the way a human develops from conception to birth is a program, a very complicated program. Since you (nor anybody) can insert new instructions randomly into a program, this is definite proof that evolution is false. You have been trying to talk your way around it for a hundred posts, trying to ignore it, trying to discuss irrelevancies. So yes indeed you have received irrefutable proof.

Let me also note that we discussed thoroughly some of the other points I made in post#1605 as to why evolution is impossible. We agreed that pretty much on 1 and 2. I showed clearly that #3 the problem of passing a mutation through a species is a very serious problem, which makes 4, the building up of a new gene by random mutations virtually impossible. We also discussed briefly #5 the unlikelihood of a new workable functional gene arising randomly. I showed with the example of men and apes that the assertion that there is a virtually unlimited amount of tries to produce such a gene is total nonsense. You may not agree with that, but still, you could not refute it and are also trying to ignore it. Therefore, I have given irrefutable proof. Your choosing to ignore it, your refusal to admit it, your saying that no proof has been given is just plain dishonest.

Gore you really make me laugh. You are saying post #1754 is your "irrefutable" evidence. Yet if this evidence is so irrefutable and iron clad, why would the authors (people who know just a little bit more on the subject) STILL believe in evolution. Look at what they write in the middle of all that:

An evolutionarily conserved class of ligands and receptors regulates such interactions in C. elegans, Drosophila, and vertebrates.

What you gave me is a far cry from "irrefutable" evidence. It is your faulty interpretation of a passage you do not even comprehend since you lack even the most basic understanding of Biology. It basically boils down to your won Personal Incredulity. Been there done that Gore.

...the problem of passing a mutation through a species is a very serious problem, which makes 4, the building up of a new gene by random mutations virtually impossible. We also discussed briefly #5 the unlikelihood of a new workable functional gene arising randomly...

G3K, could you, please, in your own words, explain the way sickle cell works? Do you see how it is maintained by classical Mendelian genetics and selected for by the presenece of malaria? Can you see how a single mutation in a single person could have (in fact almost surely) started it?

This is new information from a random event. The mutation not only makes bad hemoglobin, but it also protects against malaria.