Let's take it one step at a time. Correct me if I am wrong, but your statement is a bit of a departure from your previous assertions that NO change is possible. Am I reading you correctly now? Just answer the question - can the genome handle change - "yes" or "no"?, don't respond with a blue essay.
Are you following this thread? I am saying that no additional genetic information can come to fruition in a random evolutionary way because of the problems with evolution which I stated in post#1605. I have been very specific as to why I say that. I have given reasons which you have been unable to refute. It takes an intelligent designer to transform one species into a more complex one with more traits, more abilities, more complexity. If you disagree with that, then perhaps you can answer my question of how you can change a program and make it better and more complex by random changes.
What about the xylose metabolising bacteria?
It takes an intelligent designer
Why would an intelligent designer put unexpressed pseudogenes in there? I can actually think of a reason now after all of this. Maybe that designer is reading this ridiculous non-debate and getting a good laugh out of it.
Nature is a pretty good designer. Dont underestimate her.